71 MIllion Unused Flu Vaccines!! Hooray!!

The following story says that the US has 71 million unused swine flu shots! Let's claim victory for that fact. It means that dumbed down or not, Americans may be waking up to the massive manipulation campaign to destroy their lives and future. The massive false propaganda campaign by WHO and the governments around the world was met by an equally massive public uprising against the falsehoods and attempted herding of the population. And we helped to do it. Give yourself credit.

U.S. has 71 million unused flu vaccine doses

Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON

Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pennsylvania October 28, 2009. REUTERS/Bradley Bower" border="0">

A nurse holds up a vial of H1N1 flu vaccine prior to an inoculation at the Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pennsylvania October 28, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Bradley Bower

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States still has 71 million doses of H1N1 swine flu vaccine that have not been used, but it is not yet time to throw them out, the federal government said on Monday.

Health

States and other providers should hang on to the vaccine and continue to offer them to people until drug companies can start distributing seasonal vaccine for the coming influenza season in the autumn, said Health and Human Services Department spokesman Bill Hall.

Senator Chuck Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance committee, released a letter on Monday that he sent to HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking her how much vaccine was left over and when it would expire.

H1N1 swine flu is still technically causing a pandemic and health officials say anyone who has not been vaccinated should still try, in case it causes a third wave of serious disease.

Health experts consider swine flu likely to join the mix of seasonal flu viruses and it will be included in the seasonal flu vaccine for 2010-2011, which will also contain two other flu strains.

When the H1N1 virus started spreading in April, HHS and its agencies, along with commercial flu vaccine makers, rushed to formulate and make a vaccine.

Influenza vaccines are made using old and unwieldy methods that require incubating the virus in chicken eggs, and the process always takes months.

Vaccine started rolling out in October and the U.S. eventually ordered 229 million doses from its five licensed makers -- Novartis, AstraZeneca unit MedImmune, Sanofi Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline and Australian vaccine maker CSL.

Sebelius said last month that 162 million doses were produced and distributed, but only 90 million actually got into people's arms or noses.

VARYING SHELF LIFE

"Depending on the vaccine manufacturer, the shelf life of the H1N1 vaccines range from 18 weeks to 18 months, with some due to expire on June 30, 2010," Grassley wrote in his letter to Sebelius.

"I understand that it is not uncommon for some seasonal flu vaccines to be discarded each year, but the H1N1 vaccines were paid for with taxpayer dollars," he added, asking: "How many doses of vaccine are due to expire on June 30, 2010?"

Hall said the department would respond to Grassley.

"There are approximately 71 million doses, held by states, the distributor or the manufacturers, that remain unused, and have varying expiration dates, some as long as early 2011," Hall said by e-mail.

"We have asked states to hold on to any vaccine that has not expired, in case we continue to have regional upticks in disease, another wave, or another early start to the flu season. We are holding onto that vaccine (and advising states and vaccinators to hold onto theirs) until there is sufficient seasonal vaccine (which includes coverage for the 2009 H1N1 virus) to replace it."

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that H1N1 has killed at least 12,000 Americans and put more than 265,000 in hospital. People with chronic diseases such as asthma or diabetes, pregnant women and children were at highest risk.

Grassley also asked Sebelius whether HHS would try to increase distribution of seasonal flu vaccines.

Seasonal Flu Vaccine Increased Swine Flu Risk by 68%!

Anybody who got the seasonal flu vaccine in 2009 increased their chances of getting the pandemic swine flu by a whopping 68% according to Canadian researchers!

This, according to them, means next year you've got to double up and get both the seasonal flu shot and the pandemic swine flu.

This is how the data gets 'fudged' to increase income to the big drug and vaccine makers. Isn't it amazing how they never lose?

Oh, you know what?

They failed to mention that the seasonal flu vaccine doesn't work anyhow!

So, just in case you're confused here's what you have to do-

Get the seasonal flu vaccine even though it doesn't work, but since in will increase your chances of getting the swine flu by 68%, make sure you get that one too, that way the pharmaceuticals will earn maximum profits and their CEO's will get a bonus! Got it? Prove it by rolling up your sleeve.

Enjoy. Learn. Share.

Did 'Regular' Flu Shot Up Risks for H1N1 Flu?
Those who got seasonal vaccine were at higher risk, study found, but that shouldn't affect immunization next season

TUESDAY, April 6 (HealthDay News) The traditional seasonal flu vaccine may have increased the risk of infection with pandemic H1N1 swine flu, according to the results of four new studies by Canadian researchers.
dblclick('xxlA');

In one study, the researchers used an ongoing sentinel monitoring system to assess the frequency of prior vaccination with the seasonal flu vaccine in people diagnosed with H1N1 swine flu in 2009 compared to people without swine flu. The researchers found that seasonal flu vaccination was associated with a 68 percent increased risk of getting swine flu.
The other three studies included additional case-control investigations in Ontario and Quebec, as well as a transmission study in 47 Quebec households that were hit with swine flu. In these studies, the researchers found that seasonal flu vaccination was associated with a 1.4- to 5.0-times greater risk of having swine flu.
The studies, published April 6 in the online journal PLoS Medicine, don't show whether there is a true cause-and-effect relationship between seasonal flu vaccination and subsequent swine flu illness, or whether the association was possibly due to a common factor among the people in the study, said principal investigator Danuta Skowronski, of the British Columbia Center for Disease Control in Vancouver, and colleagues.
However, the findings may raise questions about the biological interactions between pre-existing and new pandemic influenza strains.
The researchers noted that the World Health Organization has recommended that protection against pandemic swine flu be included in future seasonal flu vaccines. This will provide direct protection against pandemic swine flu and eliminate any risk that may have been due to the 2009 seasonal vaccine, which did not include protection against swine flu.

Japanese Study: Vit D Reduces Flu By 67%

Every now and then, a scientific study is done that confirms what many of us already 'know' is true from our common experience. The Japanese have conducted a double-blind placebo controlled study that proves the effectiveness of Vitamin D in preventing the flu. The study shows up to 67% reduction in cases of influenza A among children taking Vitamin D. Then, they ruin it at the end by saying that Vit D should be given at the time of vaccination! UGGG!

Enjoy. Learn. Share

Vitamin D better than vaccines at preventing flu, report claims

Oliver Gillie

(Richard Cannon/The Times)

Vitamin D could cut the risk of flu infection in children by half, the report claims

The risk of children suffering from flu can be halved if they take vitamin D, doctors in Japan have found. The finding has implications for flu epidemics since vitamin D, which is naturally produced by the human body when exposed to direct sunlight, has no significant side effects, costs little and can be several times more effective than anti-viral drugs or vaccine.

Only one in ten children, aged six to 15 years, taking the sunshine vitamin in a clinical trial came down with flu compared with one in five given a dummy tablet. Mitsuyoshi Urashima, the Japanese doctor who led the trial, told The Times that vitamin D was more effective than vaccines in preventing flu.

Vitamin D was found to be even more effective when the comparison left out children who were already given extra vitamin D by their parents, outside the trial. Taking the sunshine vitamin was then shown to reduce the risk of flu to a third of what it would otherwise be.

Altogether 354 children took part in the trial, which took place during the winter of 2008-09, before the swine flu epidemic. Vitamin D was found to protect against influenza A, which caused last year’s epidemic, but not against the less common influenza B.

The trial, which was double blind, randomised, and fully controlled scientifically, was conducted by doctors and scientists from Jikei University School of Medicine in Tokyo, Japan.

The children were given a daily dose of 1200 IUs (international units) of vitamin D over a period of three months. In the first month children in the group taking the vitamin became ill just as often as those taking the dummy tablet. But by the second month, when the vitamin level in the children’s blood was higher, the advantage of the vitamin was clear.

The Japanese scientists, writing in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, say that the anti-viral drugs zanamivir and oseltamivir reduce risk of flu infection by 8 per cent in children who have been exposed to infection, compared with a 50 per cent or greater reduction with vitamin D.

Anti-virals are also too expensive, and possibly too toxic, to be given to the population as a whole whereas vitamin D has additional benefits. The sunshine vitamin not only prevents bone fractures but is also believed to reduce risks of cancer, heart disease, diabetes and other illness, including various bacterial as well as viral infections.

The Japanese finding supports a theory that low blood levels of the sunshine vitamin occurring in winter explain why flu epidemics generally peak between December and March.

Vitamin D activates the innate immune system, enabling the body to produce several proteins such as defensin and cathelicidin which trigger cell activity and disable viruses.

Dr Urashima said: “Vitamin D and vaccine work by quite different mechanisms. Vitamin D enhances innate immunity while vaccine enhances acquired immunity. So we do not have to select only one way of prevention, rather we should do both ways, I think.”

Dr John Oxford, professor of virology at Queen Mary School of Medicine, London, said: “This is a timely study. It will be noticed by scientists. It fits in with the seasonal pattern of flu. There is an increasing background of solid science that makes the vitamin D story credible. But this study needs to be replicated. If it is confirmed we might think of giving vitamin D at the same time as we vaccinate.”

Vaccination Bribery

This story is from the UK, but you better believe the same thing could happen here at a mall near you. Teen age girls are the target for the dangerous yet ineffective vaccine Gardasil, the most expensive vaccine ever. How do you get them to roll up their sleeves to get the shot? You bribe them! You offer them the 'incentive' of a $70 gift certificate! This is immoral and unethical and it should be illegal.

Forced Mass Medication is Wrong!!!

Enjoy. Learn. Share.

Government Bribes Teens to Get Vaccinated

Crooked campaign hits mall-loving teens Forget shady strangers and bags of candy... the biggest threat to our daughters and granddaughters comes from health officials armed with mall gift certificates. In one of the most irresponsible government programs I've ever heard of, clinics in Birmingham, England, are bribing teenage girls to get vaccinated. Believe it or not, they're offering girls up to $70 in "Love2Shop" mall vouchers in exchange for getting one of the most dangerous vaccines ever approved: Gardasil. They call this an incentive; I call it physical assault on a minor. They want a pat on the back; I want them pat down and tossed in jail. And if, as a parent, you don't like it... tough. In Jolly Old England, your daughter doesn't need your permission to get vaccinated... so you'll only find out when she comes home showing off her new earrings... or when you get a call from the emergency room after she suffers one of this dangerous drug's many side effects. I've been crusading against Gardasil from Day One. The media calls it a "cervical cancer vaccine," but don't be fooled by this fancy nickname. This vaccine doesn't protect against cervical cancer -- it protects against certain forms of HPV, an STD that can cause cervical cancer. It's far from 100 percent effective, and it's even farther from 100 percent safe. But do you expect these teenage girls to know that? Do you think they're going to go home and do the research before accepting their shopping bribe? Sadly, most of them have no clue that Gardasil has been linked to dozens of deaths and thousands of reactions ranging from anaphylactic shock and grand mal seizures to coma and paralysis. Some girls have come down with the incurable nerve disorder Guillian-Barre Syndrome after getting vaccinated, as I've warned before. And according to a stomach-turning report I found in the Daily Mail, officials in Britain are already talking about expanding the Birmingham mall scheme nationwide. If you think this won't happen here, you're only partly right. Health officials might not be bribing girls at shopping malls, but the approach they're taking could be far more devastating. Big Pharma is hard at work pressuring local officials across the country into making HPV vaccines a requirement for school. The worst part is that all of this hoopla is over something that's completely preventable. Vaccine or no vaccine, the only surefire 100 percent effective means of preventing HPV infection is abstinence. You can't spread a sexually transmitted virus without sex. It's as simple as that.

CDC Claims 57 Million Flu Cases - Huh?

Don't forget, the CDC under the direction of WHO stopped the laboratory confirmation of flu cases in the middle of the 'great swine flu pandemic of 2009' back in July! That means all reports of 'swine flu cases' have no scientific basis since that time. It's like playing tennis without a net - it's easier to win that way - there is no standard to meet.

At the same time, the CDC is ignoring the the two deadly mutations of the H1N1 that have occurred around the world which seem to be responsible for the majority of the fatal cases.

So why is the CDC acting so stupid?

Maybe they have flu on the brain - or it's all about ensuring profits for the big drug makers who are shipping the millions of unused flu vaccines over seas to third world countries.

These vaccines going to Africa and elsewhere will be labeled 'foreign aid' but all the money will go to the pharmaceutical companies which are, as we know, too big to fail - even at math.

Enjoy. Learn. Share.

CDC Claims 57 million Swine Flu Cases - Where's the Proof?

By William Campbell Douglas MD

CDC fails at math The feds are still squealing over swine flu -- but no matter how loud they oink, their numbers just don't add up. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared that 57 million Americans have come down with swine flu -- and their media lap dogs (or are they now pigs?) just ate it up. I saw that big number repeated in headlines everywhere as if that were a fact and not a completely made-up number. Oink, oink. But that's just what it is -- a story as true as those Babe the Pig movies. If someone can prove to me that 57 million Americans actually came down with swine flu, I'll trade my lab coat for overalls and take up hog farming. I mean it... but it's not going to happen. The truth is, no one knows how many swine flu cases there were, not even the math whizzes at the CDC. That 57 million figure is just the midpoint of a massive estimate range that claims up to 84 million Americans may have had swine flu. They may as well say it was between 1 and 300 million. Remember, the feds stopped counting swine flu cases in July -- they actually told state and local health authorities to stop testing for it and stop tracking it. It's better than burning evidence -- because they prevented the evidence from ever existing in the first place. Now, they can throw around any number they want without having to worry that the truth might someday come out and squeal on them. All we know for certain -- and this is based on real data from the CDC and state health departments -- is that only a tiny fraction of the suspected H1N1 cases that were sent to labs for confirmation actually turned out to be swine flu, or even any kind of flu at all. Most people just had a bad cold. Yet the feds keep pushing this myth that Americans should STILL rush out and get swine flu shots... hinting darkly at the possibility of a "third wave." If it's as "bad" as the first or second wave, you can safely keep your sleeve down... because this undercooked bacon is already cold.

Against Compulsory Vaccination

Dear Health associate:

Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad is suggesting that everyone who is interested in the subject of vaccines and vaccinations take a look at a new book on the subject by medical researcher Kevin A. Muhammad. The book reveals some of the shocking and harmful facts about vaccines and vaccination programs worldwide. Below are pictures of the author and the book's cover. We have also included the book's prologue at the bottom of this email for your enjoyment and the website address where the book can be purchased.

Thank you.

"Your partners in health"

Abundant Life Health Attainment Center 12164 Central Ave Suite 227A Mitchelville, MD 20721 (240)245-4147

Free symptom survey: www.myabundantlife.me

www.lifeabundantly-alim.blogspot.com

AGAINST COMPULSORY VACCINATION: “A Long Train of Abuses and Usurpations” Prologue by Julian K. Muhammad Very rarely has a book been written so thoroughly about a subject that it closes the knowledge gap and inspires the reader to action. As a former public policy analyst, it is my professional opinion that this series, Against Compulsory Vaccination (Vols. 1 & 2), should be required reading for every member of American society since all of us are impacted (and will continue to be impacted) by the devastating effects of vaccination in the United States and throughout the world. When reading this book it is apparent that Bro. Kevin A. Muhammad delved deeply into this subject matter; demonstrating an unquenchable commitment to educating people about the dangers of vaccination. Volume 2 is the culmination of years of work and commitment to challenging governments, pharmaceutical industries, medical associations, politicians and public policymakers, and educating the people of all nations about the underlining dangers of vaccination. This is definitely an honorable work on behalf of every person living, and those on their way here.The abuse of authority lodged in the 200-year history of vaccination, although substantially immoral, is not a “crime,” per se, in the realm of politics. As irrational as this might sound, it could be argued that the stoic character of the U.S. Constitution allows for both the immoral and moral to exist. The political process enables the enacted policies to flourish as long as there is no “apparent” violation of the Constitution and its sibling documents. The question now becomes what attitude dominants public policy? Is it one inclined to morality or one bent on self-interest and disdain for true public service?In this series, Bro. Kevin explains how public health was established as a government division for the purpose of mass vaccination. This makes “public policy” the life-blood of vaccination. The urgency related to vaccination calls us to action. This response cannot be reduced to mere anger, alone. Any anger generated by a desire for decency should urge us to understand the public policies that many legislators feel solely belong to them, in the confines of legislative halls.Within the past decade, congressional and state legislative halls have gradually become off limits to anyone outside of the well-connected political and corporate cliques. Laws are drafted in secrecy and seldom unveiled even when passed into law. Who should be blamed for this? Has dereliction in our civil responsibilities become pandemic, too, along with vaccine-induced diseases? Have agendas based on race, gender and sexual orientation distracted us from the constant medical abuse poured on children of all races and genders? The knowledge imparted through this series, Against Compulsory Vaccination, goes directly to why involvement in public policy is every citizen's duty. We understand the issues, and then raise a voice, a hand, or a fist to make ourselves heard and respected. This is due diligence.With this said, the United States political arena is gangrenous, almost to the extent that not much remains left to save or salvage. Enacting laws that favor corporations is status quo and seems impossible to rectify. This leaves us no choice but to transcend the senseless folly of politicians so filled with self-interest that they are ill-qualified to adequately lead, even themselves. I am reminded of the words of Jesus in Matthew 15:14: “Leave them; they are blind guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”We live in this pit, in the form of perpetual injustices, the deprivation of God-ordained opportunities, and immeasurable injuries to our children. This is why I especially appreciate Bro. Kevin's reference to Marc Widdowson's description of a dark age: “a melting pot when the old, corrupted and exhausted institutions of a failed society are finally broken down and destroyed. Something new and better suited to human needs can then be built in their place.” There is an atom of light in the pit. The transition into the “better suited” begins with the knowledge of the problems, and the actions that fuel them. This series, Against Compulsory Vaccination, contains what it takes to settle the 200-year old dispute about the place of vaccination in our lives. If it has no place, then why doesn't it? If casting it is a formidable undertaking, then how can it be done? The answers to both questions are found in these two volumes. Julian K. MuhammadWashington, DCPrice: $15.00232 pages, tables, referencesISBN: 978-0-9823593-0-3To order visit: http://www.kamuhammad.net

I, Virus...

Most of us take being human for granted. We just assume we are. But are we really 100% human according to our genetic structure? I always wondered about the incorporation of viral genetic material from vaccines and that is one of the reasons I am opposed to the widespread use of vaccines. I wonder if we might be producing 'hybrid humans'. The following article goes even further and asserts that 50% of our genetic material is not human, but viral, hence the title: I, Virus...
Enjoy. Learn. Think. Share.

I, Virus: Why You are Only Half Human
by Frank Ryan
Continue reading page 1 2 3
In 1950, rabbits infected with myxoma virus were released into the wild. Within three months 99.8 per cent of rabbits in south-east Australia were dead
Although the myxomatosis epidemic was not planned as an evolutionary experiment, it had evolutionary consequences. The myxoma virus's natural host is the Brazilian rabbit, in which it is a persistant partner causing no more than minor skin blemishes. The same is now true of rabbits in Australia. Over the course of the epidemic the virus selected for rabbits with a minority genetic variant capable of surviving infection. Plague culling was followed by co-evolution, and today rabbit and virus coexist in a largely non-pathogenic mutualism.
Now imagine a plague virus attacking an early human population in Africa. The epidemic would have followed a similar trajectory, with plague culling followed by a period in which survivors and virus co-evolved. There is evidence that this happened repeatedly during our evolution, though when, and through what infectious agents, is unknown (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 99, p 11748).
Even today viral diseases are changing the course of human evolution. Although the plague culling effect is mitigated by medical intervention in the AIDS pandemic, we nevertheless observe selection pressure on humans and virus alike. For example, the human gene HLA-B plays an important role in the response to HIV-1 infection, and different variants are strongly associated with the rate of AIDS progression. It is therefore likely that different HLA-B alleles impose selection pressure on HIV-1, while HLA-B gene frequencies in the population are likely to be influenced by HIV (Nature, vol 432, p 769). This is symbiogenesis in action.
How does that move us closer to understanding the composition of the human genome? HIV-1 is a retrovirus, a class of RNA virus that converts its RNA genome into DNA before implanting it into host chromosomes. This process, known as endogenisation, converts an infectious virus into a non-infectious endogenous retrovirus (ERV). In humans, ERVs are called HERVs.
Germline invaders
Endogenisation allows retroviruses to take genetic symbiosis to a new level. Usually it is an extension of the normal infectious process, when a retrovirus infects a blood cell, such as a lymphocyte. But if the virus happens to get incorporated in a chromosome in the host's germ line (sperm or egg), it can become part of the genome of future generations.
Such germ-line endogenisation has happened repeatedly in our own lineage - it is the source of all that viral DNA in our genome. The human genome contains thousands of HERVs from between 30 and 50 different families, believed to be the legacy of epidemics throughout our evolutionary history. We might pause to consider that we are the descendents of the survivors of a harrowing, if brutally creative, series of viral epidemics.
Endogenisation is happening right now in a retroviral epidemic that is spreading among koalas in Australia. The retrovirus, KoRv, appeared about 100 years ago and has already spread through 75 per cent of the koala's range, culling animals on a large scale and simultaneously invading the germ line of the survivors.
Retroviruses don't have a monopoly on endogenisation. Earlier this month researchers reported finding genes from a bornavirus in the genomes of several mammals, including humans, the first time a virus not in the retrovirus class has been identified in an animal genome. The virus appears to have entered the germ line of a mammalian ancestor around 40 million years ago (Nature, vol 463, p 84). Many more such discoveries are anticipated, perhaps explaining the origin of some of that mysterious half of the genome.
The ability of viruses to unite, genome-to-genome, with their hosts has clear evolutionary significance. For the host, it means new material for evolution. If a virus happens to introduce a useful gene, natural selection will act on it and, like a beneficial new mutation, it may spread through the population.
Could a viral gene really be useful to a mammal? Don't bet against it. Retroviruses have undergone a long co-evolutionary relationship with their hosts, during which they have evolved the ability to manipulate host defences for their own ends. So we might expect the genes of viruses infecting humans to be compatible with human biology.
This is also true of their regulatory DNA. A virus integrating itself into the germ line brings not just its own genes, but also regulatory regions that control those genes. Viral genomes are bookended by regions known as long terminal repeats (LTRs), which contain an array of sequences capable of controlling not just viral genes but host ones as well. Many LTRs contain attachment sites for host hormones, for example, which probably evolved to allow the virus to manipulate host defences.
Retroviruses will often endogenise repeatedly throughout the host genome, leading to a gradual accumulation of anything up to 1000 ERVs. Each integration offers the potential of symbiogenetic evolution.
Once an ERV is established in the genome, natural selection will act on it, weeding out viral genes or regulatory sequences that impair survival of the host, ignoring those that have no effect, and positively selecting the rare ones that enhance survival.
Read full article
Continue reading page 1 2 3

Vaccines Alter the Genetic Structure of Human Beings

The following article may be hard reading for some, but it is actually worth it to go through it. It is a little bit technical, but the main points are clear.

Vaccines may alter the genetic structure of a human being!

We are human because we have the genetic makeup of a human being. This is called the human genome. If through vaccines the human genome is altered, then is it still the human genome?

If a 'person' has an alteration in its genome is that 'person', strictly speaking, still human?

In other words, have our children been made into hybrid human beings?

Mixtures of monkeys, pigs, chickens, cows, goats, viruses, bacteria, etc.

The article shows that these genetic changes are passed from parents to their children,

making them permanent.

This is the major reason vaccines are dangerous and should be outlawed:

They change the human genome!

We assert out right to remain human!

Enjoy. Learn. Think. Share.

(Note on my related blog, Original Dialogue, just today I posted an article about human mutation experiments going on at Plum Island, NY. Check it out.

It's all related.)

Are Current Childhood Vaccine programs compromising the genetics
of present and future generations?
by
Harold E. Buttram
Introduction
Previously published parts of this “Vaccine Overview” series reviewed the steadily increasing patterns of physical and mental health problems which have taken place since the relatively innocent times of the 1930s, largely involving the “4-A Disorders” (i.e., Autism, ADHD, Asthma, Allergies), now afflicting roughly one third of America’s children.(1) They also reviewed the U.S. Congressional Hearings on Vaccine Safety (1999-December, 2004) which revealed gross deficiencies in vaccine safety testing by federal health bureaucracies (FDA, CDC, NIH, etc.), as defined by Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and Quality of Evidence Ratings (QER).(2,3)
Because of surveillance and reporting deficiencies, we have no means of proving adverse vaccine reactions when they do occur. Since the growing patterns of adverse childhood health patterns have run parallel with increasing numbers of vaccines being administered (now up to 32 inoculations before school), common sense would have us suspect a causal relationship.
From a conceptual standpoint it is inconceivable that these adverse childhood health trends are not accompanied by corresponding genetic compromise and hybridization, the sources of which would be large-scale vaccine contamination with retroviruses and their reverse transcriptase enzymes, capable of imprinting viral DNA into the genetics of our children.
Although the human immune system is of almost inconceivable complexity in its detailed functions, the basic principles are quite simple, which might be compared with a medieval castle with an outer mote, an outer wall with parapets, and an inner defense wall, all of which serve to protect the king (brain and nervous system) and queen (genetic system).
Following this model, the human immune system is divided into two major classes: Cellular Immunity, located in the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts and their respective lymph nodes (outer defenses), and Humoral Immunity, with production of antigen-specific antibodies by plasma cells in the bone marrow (inner defenses). For eons of time the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts have been the primary sites of infectious microbe entry into the body so that, of necessity, mucosal immunity has evolved as the primary defense system, with humoral immunity serving a secondary or backup role. As reviewed earlier, vaccines are reversing these roles, (4) attempting to substitute vaccine-induced humoral immunity for the far more efficient mucosal immunity, the latter in turn undergoing a process of “atrophy of disuse” as a result of this role-switching.
The present article addresses some of the known pathways whereby some viral vaccines may be implanting their genetic material into the DNA of our children, and of the possible consequences.
Grossly Overlooked Mutational Risks
Viral vaccines, composed of mainly genetic material, may pose as much, or even greater, potential risk for causing genetic hybridization than other forms of vaccines (i.e., live viral or attenuated vaccines). This warning is supported by a study reported in Viral Research, in which a nuclear polyhedrosis virus was sent through 24 serial passages of culture media resulting in both “genetic insertions into and deletions from the virus,” (5) suggesting a propensity of viruses to accept, carry, and transfer genetic material from host to host.
This research and consideration takes on more gravity when we consider the extent of foreign genetic contamination in current vaccines:
“Among the 32 vaccines in current use, 7 contain chick embryo fluid or protein, 3 contain cells from monkeys, 1 contains sheep’s red blood cells, 1 contains mouse serum, 1 contains material from guinea-pig embryos, and 4 have cells from human aborted fetal tissue.”(6)
Additional research shows that vaccines containing aluminum, the mercury-based preservative (Thimerosal), and formaldehyde, pose additional risks for prompting genetic mutations following intoxications.(6a-d)
As reviewed by Roberts in “The Dangerous Impurities of Vaccines:”
“In 1998 and 1999 scientists representing the World Health Organization (WHO) met with the senior vaccine regulatory scientists from the USA and UK at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Washington D.C. to discuss the safety of the manufacturing methods employed to produce vaccines. No journalists were present, but official transcripts were kept. What they record is that all the many experts that spoke expressed grave concern over the safety of the manufacturing process currently employed to make the licensed vaccines, such as MMR, flu, yellow fever, and polio. It was reported by leading experts that the vaccines could not be purified, were “primitive,” made on “crude materials,” and the manufacturers could not meet lowered government standards. WHO specialists reported the widespread and continuing presence in the MMR vaccine of chicken leucosis virus. Others spoke about the presence of foamy virus, many other viruses, toxins, foreign proteins, enzymes and possibly prions and oncogenes, (which, being of equal or smaller size than the desired viral vaccines, cannot be filtered out). Grave concerns were expressed about the levels of foreign residual DNA and RNA contaminating the vaccines. It was feared that this (contamination) could be causing cancers and autoimmune diseases.” (7, 8)
Immune Suppression as a Co-Factor in Mutagenesis
In addition to the proneness of viral vaccines to exchange and transfer genetic material from host to host, another danger is that viral vaccines are inherently immunosuppressive, as reflected in the fact that viral infections tend to lower white blood cell (WBC) counts in contrast to bacterial infections, which raise WBC counts. Furthermore, in the field of chemical toxicology it is universally recognized that combinations of toxins may bring exponential increases of toxicity; that is a combination of two chemicals may bring a 10-fold increase in toxicity, three chemicals 100-fold increases. (9, 10) This same principle almost certainly applies to the immunosuppressive effects of viral vaccines when administered in combination, as with the MMR vaccine, among which the measles vaccine is exceptionally immunosuppresive. (11-13)
Returning to the medieval castle model of the human immune system, it is probable that the powerful, immune-suppressant effects of viral vaccines, when given in combination, may paralyze first-line cellular (mucosal) immune defenses sufficiently to allow viral DNA-grafting to take place into the genetics of many infants.
Considering that these vaccines will also be carrying elements of foreign bovine (from gelatin), chicken, monkey, and human proteins, which will also be transplanted into infant genetics, it might not be far amiss to consider viruses as nature’s ultimate polluters, all the more insidious because the process remains unrecognized.
Retroviruses and Reverse Transcriptase
“A retrovirus is a virus that does not enter host cells with a DNA genome, but an RNA genome. The most common way the RNA genome is replicated is via the enzyme reverse transcriptase to make DNA out if its RNA genome. The DNA is then incorporated into the host’s genome by an integrase enzyme. The virus thereafter replicates as part of the host cell’s DNA. Retroviruses are enveloped viruses that belong to the viral family, Retroviridae.” (14)
“Reverse transcriptase, also known as RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, is an enzyme that transcribes single-stranded RNA into double-stranded DNA…Normal transcription involves synthesis of RNA from DNA; hence,
reverse transcription is the reverse of this.” (15)
It is not necessary to understand these technical terms to know their underlying meanings. As outlined in Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s scholarly text, Fowl! Bird Flu: It’s Not What You Think:
“Because of the way reverse transcriptase works in living cells, it is possible that genetic material from chicken viruses (and other retroviruses) is being woven into human DNA, especially that of our children.” (16)
Known sources of retrovirus/reverse transcriptase contaminations include the avian leukosis virus subgroup E and endogenous avian virus in measles and mumps vaccines (17) the influenza vaccine, (18) the sources being traced back to cultures in fertilized chicken eggs.
M.G. Montinari and Immunogenetics
Dr. Montinari and colleagues are best known for investigating the relationship between postvaccine central nervous system (CNS) diseases and mutation of human leukocyte antigens, (HLA) which essentially strip the body’s brain and nerve tissues of their outer coating of myelin. (19) The HLA system is one which aids an individual’s immune system to differentiate that which is “self” from that which is “nonself.” Although the mechanisms are complex, it is a system which, during embryonic life, learns to recognize healthy or normal cells of the body as “self” so that these cells will remain unmolested by the search and destroy mechanisms of the immune system, leaving the immune system free to eliminate foreign invaders. Of special concern is the fact that the HLA system also carries an increased proneness to mutations, which may result in an impairment of self-recognition. This process may be the fundamental cause underlying autoimmune disorders, in which the immune system attacks the cells of its own body.
Montinari found that certain alleles of HLA (A3 and DR7) were more frequent in patients with postvaccine-induced illness, which implicates an immunogenetic basis for such illnesses. What caused much concern was that Montinari and other researchers implicated vaccine adjuvants (additives), such as mercury-containing Thimerosal, as causing genetic mutations by modifying the amino acids in presenting antigen proteins. (20-22)
Herpes Virus Integration with DNA Transferred from Parents to Babies
Based on a public release of 2-Sept-2008 from the University of Rochester Medical Center, new research has shown that some parents pass on the human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) to their children because it is integrated into the parental chromosomes. This is the first time a virus has been shown to become a part of the human DNA and then get passed to subsequent generations.
This unique form of congenital infection may be occurring in as many as 1 in 116 newborns according to the report. The long-term consequences for a child’s development and immune system are unknown. (23)
Since it is known that viral DNA can be engrafted into parental DNA and then passed on to subsequent generations, should we not be investigating today’s live virus vaccines from this standpoint and looking into the possible consequences?
Summary and Conclusions
As outlined above, there are several factors indicating a possibility that the soaring incidence of physical and mental illnesses among today’s children are causally related to current childhood vaccine programs. Primary among these is the large-scale contamination of the measles, mumps, and influenza vaccines with retroviruses capable of engrafting their genetics into the DNA of childhood recipients. This is rendered more likely because of the cavalier regard with which combinations of viral vaccines are now being administered, primarily involving the MMR vaccines, but conceivably also in combination with chicken pox and influenza vaccines in today’s vaccine schedules, in spite of the toxicology principle that combinations of toxins may bring exponential (10-fold or 100-fold) increases in toxicity.
With some of today’s routine viral vaccines known to be contaminated with retroviruses and administered under conditions likely to bring varying degrees of immune paralysis in the recipient, these are conditions under which genetic hybridization would appear to be likely or inevitable.
Admittedly, this is indirect evidence which does not constitute proof, but consider this: The steadily increasing patterns of physical and/or mental illnesses among American children show no signs of abating. Unless this issue is definitively addressed, at some future time the process will pass a point of no return socially and economically from the sheer numbers of incapacitated children.
America unquestionably has the scientific technology to work out the proof that is needed to mandate a reduction and modification of current vaccine programs. The question is whether or not we have the necessary insights and determination to do so.
References
1.Bock K. Stauth C. Healing the New Childhood Epidemics, Autism, ADHD, Asthma, Allergies. New York: Ballantine Books, 2007.
2.Donohoe M. Evidence-based medicine and Shaken Baby Syndrome. Part I: Literature Review, 1966-1998. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 2003; 24:239-242.
3.Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaesche RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, User’s guides to the medical literature, XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. JAMA, 2008; 284(10): 290-6.
4.Buttram H. Current childhood vaccine programs: An overview with emphasis on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and of its compromising of the mucosal immune system, Medical Veritas, 2008; 5:1820-1827.
5.Kumar S, Miller IK. Effects of serial passage of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus to cell culture. Virus Research, 1987; 7:335-49.
6.Rense.com’s List of Vaccine Ingredients; Vaccination Liberation Index; Co-factors in mutagenesis, see: http://www.springerlink.com/content/reaqqy3re1wy9xdu/. For aluminum in mutagenesis in plants, see: http://www.springerlink.com/content/reaqqy3re1wy9xdu/ For formaldehyde mutagenesis, see: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T2C-3YTCCB5-H&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1136849680&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=7af93b19de77aaf45fa7365c2f074bc8. For mercury mutagenesis, see: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/111091091/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
7.Roberts J. The dangerous impurities of vaccines. Medical Veritas, 2008; 5:1897-1905.
8.Available online at http://www.fda.gov/Cher/advisory/vrbp/vrbpmain.htm.
9.Schubert J, Riley EJ, Tyler SA. Combined effects in toxicology: A rapid systematic testing procedure: cadmium, mercury, and lead. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1978; 4: 763-776.
10.Abou-Donia MB, Wilmarth KR, Ochme F, Jensen KF, and TI Kurt. Neurotoxicity resulting from coexposure to Pyridostigmine bromide, DEET, and Permithrin: Implications of Gulf War chemical exposures. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 1996; 48: 35-56.
11. Overfield T, Hammes IM, Depression of tuberculin reaction by viral (measles) vaccines. New England Journal of Medicine, 1964; 711:1294-1296.
12.Karp C, Wysocka M, Wakefield AJ, Mechanism of suppression of cell-mediated immunity by measles virus, Science, 1996; 273:228-231.
13.Kerdiles YM, Sellin Cl, Druelle J, Harvat B. Immunosuppression by measles virus: Role of viral proteins. Rev Medical Virology, 2006; 16:49-63.
14.Retrovirus – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, on the internet.
15.Reverse Transcriptase – the free encyclopedia, on the internet.
16.Tenpenny, Sherri J. Fowl! Bird Flu: It’s Not What You Think, NMA Media Press (Private Company) , 2006: 78.
17.Tsang SX, Switzer WM, Shanmugam V, Johnson JA, Goldsmith C, Wright A et al, Evidence of avian leucosis virus subgroup E and endogenous avian virus in measles and mumps vaccines derived from chicken cells: Investigation of transmission to vaccine recipients. Journal of Virology, 1999; 73: 5843-51.
18.Weiss R, RNA tumor viruses, RNA Tumor Viruses. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1982. pp 1109 – 1203.
19.Montinari, M.G., Favoino, B., Roberto, A., Diagnostic role of immunogenetics in post-vaccine diseases of the CNS: preliminary results. Mediterranean Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 1996; 4(2):69-72.
20.Miglore, L., and Niere, M. Evaluation of twelve potential aneuploidogenic chemicals by the in vitro human lymphocyte micronucleus assay, Toxicity in Vitro, 1991; 5(4):325-336.
21.Miller, B.M. and Adler, I.D., Aneuploid induction on mouse spermatocyte mutogenesis, Mutogenesis, 1992; 7(1):69-76.
22.Shrana, I. Mitosis and numerical chromosome aberration analyses in human lymphocytes: 10 known or suspected spindle poisons. Mutation Research, 1993; 187:57-60.
23.Based on Public Internet release dated 2-Sept-2008, a report which was issued from the Rochester University Medical Center entitled, “Virus Weaves Itself into the DNA Transferred from Parents to Babies,” which can be accessed under this title.

2200 US Swine Flu Deaths Among Those Who Received the Vaccine!

If you are like 80% of the American people, you never received the swine flu vaccine. Maybe you read this blog, or you heard others who were debunking the scare tactics of the government who were trying to herd the whole world into accepting the untested unproven novel flu vaccine. So you never got the shot, but you have been wondering whether or not you did the right thing. Now we know that approximately 2200 of the 11,000 flu deaths in this country occurred among those who were vaccinated! The vaccine does not work! It's a fraud and a scam! You were right not to roll up your sleeve. The vaccine has no more than a 1% effectiveness rate! It's the same trick from 1976 all over again. So just keep taking your Vitamin D and don't worry about it any more.

Enjoy. Learn. Share.

Thousands Who Received H1N1 Vaccine Died Anyway!

NaturalNews) The CDC is engaged in a very clever, statistically devious spin campaign, and nearly every journalist in the mainstream media has fallen for its ploy. No one has yet reported what I'm about to reveal here.It all started with the CDC's recent release of new statistics about swine flu fatalities, infection rates and vaccination rates. According to the CDC:• 61 million Americans were vaccinated against swine flu (about 20% of the U.S. population). The CDC calls this a "success" even though it means 4 out of 5 people rejected the vaccines.• 55 million people "became ill" from swine flu infections.• 246,000 Americans were hospitalized due to swine flu infections.• 11,160 Americans died from the swine flu.Base on these statistics, the CDC is now desperately urging people to get vaccinated because they claim the pandemic might come back and vaccines are the best defense.But here's the part you're NOT being told.The CDC statistics lie by omission. They do not reveal the single most important piece of information about H1N1 vaccines: How many of the people who died from the swine flu had already been vaccinated?
Many who died had already been vaccinatedThe CDC is intentionally not tracking how many of the dead were previously vaccinated. They want you (and mainstream media journalists) to mistakenly believe that ZERO deaths occurred in those who were vaccinated. But this is blatantly false. Being vaccinated against H1N1 swine flu offers absolutely no reduction in mortality from swine flu infections.And that means roughly 20% of the 11,160 Americans who died from the swine flu were probably already vaccinated against swine flu. That comes to around 2,200 deaths in people who were vaccinated!How do I know that swine flu vaccines don't reduce infection mortality? Because I've looked through all the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that have ever been conducted on H1N1 vaccines. It didn't take me very long, because the number of such clinical trials is ZERO.That's right: There is not a single shred of evidence in existence today that scientifically supports the myth that H1N1 vaccines reduce mortality from H1N1 infections. The best evidence I can find on vaccines that target seasonal flu indicates a maximum mortality reduction effect of somewhere around 1% of those who are vaccinated. The other 99% have the same mortality rate as people who were not vaccinated.So let's give the recent H1N1 vaccines the benefit of the doubt and let's imagine that they work just as well as other flu vaccines. That means they would reduce the mortality rate by 1%. So out of the 2,200 deaths that took place in 2009 in people who were already vaccinated, the vaccine potentially may have saved 22 people.
61 million injections add up to bad public health policySo let's see: 61 million people are injected with a potentially dangerous vaccine, and the actual number "saved" from the pandemic is conceivably just 22. Meanwhile, the number of people harmed by the vaccine is almost certainly much, much higher than 22. These vaccines contain nervous system disruptors and inflammatory chemicals that can cause serious health problems. Some of those problems won't be evident for years to come... future Alzheimer's victims, for example, will almost certainly those who received regular vaccines, I predict.Injecting 61 million people with a chemical that threatens the nervous system in order to avoid 22 deaths -- and that's the best case! -- is an idiotic public health stance. America would have been better off doing nothing rather than hyping up a pandemic in order to sell more vaccines to people who don't need them. Better yet, what the USA could have done that would have been more effective is handing out bottles of Vitamin D to 61 million people. At no more cost than the vaccines, the bottles of vitamin D supplements would have saved thousands of lives and offered tremendously importantly additional benefits such as preventing cancer and depression, too.
The one question the CDC does not want you to askThrough its release of misleading statistics, the CDC wants everyone to believe that all of the people who died from H1N1 never received the H1N1 vaccine. That's the implied mythology behind the release of their statistics. And yet they never come right out and say it, do they? They never say, "None of these deaths occurred in patients who had been vaccinated against H1N1."They can't say that because it's simply not true. It would be a lie. And if that lie were exposed, people might begin to ask questions like, "Well gee, if some of the people who were killed by the swine flu were already vaccinated against swine flu, then doesn't that mean the vaccine doesn't protect us from dying?"That's the number one question that the CDC absolutely, positively does not want people to start asking.So they just gloss over the point and imply that vaccines offer absolute protection against H1N1 infections. But even the CDC's own scientists know that's complete bunk. Outright quackery. No vaccine is 100% effective. In fact, when it comes to influenza, no vaccine is even 10% effective at reducing mortality. There's not even a vaccine that's 5% effective. And there's never been a single shred of credible scientific information that says a flu vaccine is even 1% effective.So how effective are these vaccines, really? There are a couple thousand vaccinated dead people whose own deaths help answer that question: They're not nearly as effective as you've been led to believe.They may not be effective at all.
Crunching the numbers: Why vaccines just don't add upThink about this: 80% of Americans refused to get vaccinated against swine flu. That's roughly 240 million people.Most of those 240 million people were probably exposed to the H1N1 virus at some point over the last six months because the virus was so widespread.How many of those 240 million people were actually killed by H1N1? Given the CDC's claimed total of deaths at 11,160, if you take 80% of that (because that's the percentage who refused to be vaccinated), you arrive at 8,928. So roughly 8,900 people died out of 240 million. That's a death rate among the un-vaccinated population of .0000372With a death rate of .0000372, the swine flu killed roughly 1 out of every 26,700 people who were NOT vaccinated. So even if you skipped the vaccine, you had a 26,699 out of 26,700 chance of surviving.Those are pretty good odds. Ridiculously good. You have a 700% greater chance of being struck by lightning in your lifetime, by the way.What it all means is that NOT getting vaccinated against the swine flu is actually a very reasonable, intelligent strategy for protecting your health. Mathematically, it is the smarter play.Because, remember: Some of the dead victims of H1N1 got vaccinated. In fact, I personally challenge the CDC to release statistics detailing what percentage of the dead people had previously received such vaccines.The headline to this article, "Thousands of Americans died from H1N1 even after receiving vaccine shots" is a direct challenge to the CDC, actually. If the CDC believes this headline is wrong -- and that the number of vaccinated Americans who died from H1N1 is zero -- then why don't they say so on the record?The answer? Because they'd be laughed right out of the room. Everybody who has been following this with any degree of intelligence knows that the H1N1 vaccine was a medical joke from the start. There is no doubt that many of those who died from H1N1 were previously vaccinated. The CDC just doesn't want you to know how many (and they hope you'll assume it's zero).
Where are all the real journalists?I find it especially fascinating that the simple question of "How many of the dead were previously vaccinated?" has never been asked in print by a single journalist in any mainstream newspaper or media outline across the country. Not the NY Times, not WashingtonPost.com, not the WSJ, LA Times or USA Today. (At least, not that I'm aware of. If you find one that does, let me know and I'll link to their article!)Isn't there a single journalist in the entire industry that has the journalistic courage to ask this simple question of the CDC? Why do these mainstream journalists just reprint the CDC's statistics without asking a single intelligent question about them?Why is all the intelligent, skeptical reporting about H1N1 found only in the alternative press or independent media sites?You already know the answer, but I'll say it anyway: Because most mainstream media journalists are just part of the propaganda machine, blindly reprinting distorted statistics from "authorities" without ever stopping to question those authorities.The MSM today, in other words, is often quite pathetic. Far from the independent media mindset that used to break big stories like Watergate, today's mainstream media is little more than a mouthpiece for the corporatocracy that runs our nation. The MSM serves the financial interests of the corporations, just as the CDC and WHO do. That's why they're all spouting the same propaganda with their distorted stories about H1N1 swine flu.But those who are intelligent enough to ask skeptical questions about H1N1 already realize what an enormous con the pandemic was. In the end, it turned out to be a near-harmless virus that was hyped up by the CDC, WHO and drug companies in order to sell hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines that are now about to be dumped down the drain as useless.Sources for this story include:CNNhttp://edition.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/...Washington Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...

53 Vaccine Shots by Age Six

Here is the latest from our medical researcher, Bro Kevin Muhammad. Here he goes into the government mandated vaccination schedule for our children. This is the challenge we are up against. In total there are 53 mandated vaccine shots by the age of 6, with more on the way! This is an outrage and obvious genocide that we must resist with all the might we can muster. What follows here is an excerpted portion. You can find the entire article at Bro Kevin's web site below.

© 2009 KEVIN A. MUHAMMAD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
HTTP://WWW.KAMUHAMMAD.NET
DECEMBER 25, 2009
In the Name of Allah, The Beneficent, The Merciful
This paper was co-authored with my twin brother, Julian K. Muhammad
. . . . .
DIVINE GUIDANCE AND ITS VALIDATION
In a lecture delivered on October 28, 2007, titled Black Youth in Peril, Part 1, the Honorable Louis
Farrakhan stated:
...A man by the name of Bertrand Russell advocated the use of vaccines to induce partial chemical
lobotomies and create a servile, zombie population. This is why, in America, there are soaring rates of
autism, and increasing amounts of vaccines being mandated for babies and young children...
These words became the foundation of the national anti-vaccination campaign launched in early 2008. The
initial goal of the campaign was and is to educate the citizenry about the dangers of vaccination. The second
goal is to ratify our own health policies regarding vaccination, under the leadership of the Honorable Louis
Farrakhan—policies that are in accord with the Will of the Creator. We should care nothing about what the
CDC, FDA and other government health agencies have to say. We have already heard from them, and their
ploys have only meant unnecessary suffering, debilitation and premature death for us and our children.
ANALYZING THE CDC’S NATIONAL IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE
Just how many vaccines are mandated for babies and young children? Let us examine the CDC’s official
document, Recommended Immunization Schedule for Persons Aged 0 through 6 Years—United States
2009. Again, this document is released annually by the ACIP, in collaboration with the American Academy of
Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Most children in the U.S. receive vaccines from
the time they are born and throughout the rest of their lives. However, the lion’s share of vaccines are
administered during their most critical developmental years, which are between 0 and 6 years of age.
This is why this particular immunization schedule is extremely important, and should be an urgent matter
for all citizens. The following sections are divided according to the age of the child, detailing the kinds and
number of vaccines administered within each age category—according to the CDC’s immunization
schedule.
WHEN THE BABY IS 48 HOURS TO 1 MONTH OLD
The Hepatitis B vaccine is the first to be given, as previously stated. The vaccine is administered in a twodose
series. The first dose is given at birth, usually within 48 hours after the child is born. The second dose
is given when the baby is one month old. — number of vaccines administered: 2
What should a mother and father know about this vaccine? In addition to the “secretive” geneticallyengineered
microorganisms, the other ingredients in hepatitis B vaccines include: aluminium, mercury,
PAGE 8 FROM THE DESK
Part 1: Examining the CDC’s National Vaccination Schedule
formaldehyde, polysorbate 20, and MRC-5 cellular protein, a protein derived from the lung tissue of male
fetuses.
WHEN THE BABY IS 2 MONTHS OLD
At merely 2 months old, the infant begins a series of vaccinations, which consist of seven (7) different
vaccines. These vaccines are:
􀂄 Rotavirus
􀂄 Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
􀂄 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
􀂄 Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)
􀂄 Inactivated poliovirus (IPV)
Three of these vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) are usually administered in the combination
shot, DTaP. The number of genetically-engineered microorganisms, metals, industrial chemicals and drugs
being injected into the infant at this tender and supple age of 2 months is enormous. — number of
vaccines administered: 7
WHEN THE BABY IS 4 MONTHS OLD
After being injected with seven different vaccines at 2 months old or 8 weeks old or 60 days old, the infant
returns two months later (4 months of age) to receive the second wave of toxic shots. Again, the vaccines
are:
􀂄 Rotavirus vaccine
􀂄 Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
􀂄 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
􀂄 Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)
􀂄 Inactivated poliovirus (IPV)
— number of vaccines administered: 7
WARNING
Please be advised that every vaccine mentioned throughout this paper contains just as many
or more poisonous “secretive” genetically-engineered microorganisms and brain-damaging
chemicals.
WARNING
At this point, the 4-month old infant has received 16 vaccines, since its birth.
. . . . .
FROM THE DESK TOWARD OUR OWN HEALTH POLICY—CONCERNING VACCINATION - PAGE 9
WHEN THE BABY IS 6 MONTHS OLD
Two months later, at 6 months old, the infant receives another round of the same toxic vaccines that were
administered when she/he was 2 months and 4 months old, with the exception of the polio vaccine. The
third dose of polio vaccine is administered later in the immunization schedule. The vaccines administered
at the 6-month mark are:
􀂄 Rotavirus vaccine
􀂄 Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
􀂄 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
􀂄 Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)
— number of vaccines administered: 6
WHEN THE BABY IS 6 TO 18 MONTHS OLD
The infant receives the final dose of the Hepatitis B vaccine between ages 6 months and 18 months. The
pediatrician may recommend administering the Inactivated poliovirus (IPV) vaccine when the infant is 9
months old in order to reduce the number of shots given at age 6 months. — number of vaccines
administered: 2
WHEN THE BABY IS 6 TO 59 MONTHS OLD
The baby is given an annual influenza vaccine. In the initial administration of this vaccine, the baby usually
receives two (2) doses, spaced one month apart. In the following years, only one dose of the vaccine is
recommended. — number of vaccines: 2 +( 5 = 7)
WHEN THE BABY IS 12 TO 15 MONTHS OLD
The final doses of both the Hib and PCV vaccines are administered when the child is 12 months or older.
The first doses of measles, mumps, rubella and varicella (chickenpox) vaccines are also given at this time.
The measles, mumps, rubella are administered in one shot, called the MMR vaccine. To avoid giving all
four shots to the baby in one office visit, the pediatrician may give the MMR and varicella vaccines at 12
months, and the Hib and PCV vaccines at 15 months. The MMR and varicella vaccines may also be
combined into a single shot. Regardless how the injections are administered, the vaccines injected into the
baby are:
􀂄 Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) - final dose of series
􀂄 Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) - final dose of series
WARNING
By the time the baby is a year old, it has received 24 vaccines.
PAGE 10 FROM THE DESK
Part 1: Examining the CDC’s National Vaccination Schedule
􀂄 Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
􀂄 Chickenpox (varicella)
— number of vaccines administered: 6
WHEN THE BABY IS 12 TO 23 MONTHS OLD
The baby receives two doses of the Hepatitis A vaccine between ages 12 and 23 months. The shots are
administered, at least, six months apart. — number of vaccines administered: 2
Here, we must note that most diagnoses for neurological diseases, such as autism—the so-called mystery
disease—take place during this time. The physician or pediatrician fails to acknowledge that the 35
extremely toxic vaccines the child has, thus far, received is the cause of this life-long, neurological disease.
Many parents also fail to make the connection; therefore, they keep allowing their “autistic” child to be
vaccinated, adding insult to further injury. Again, the ignorance of parents and their fear to defy government
vaccination mandates are the greatest threats to their children.
WHEN THE BABY IS 15 TO 18 MONTHS OLD
Between the ages 15 and 18 months, the baby receives the fourth dose of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular
pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. In some cases, the fourth dose is given as early as age 12 months, but it must be
administered six months after the third dose. — number of vaccines administered: 3
WHEN THE BABY IS 2 TO 6 YEARS OLD
An additional dose of pneumococcal vaccine or hepatitis A vaccine or one dose of meningococcal vaccine is
recommended for children between the ages of 2 and 6 years, who are in so-called “high-risk groups.” This
basically means all children. Government health agencies push this vaccine on all children. — number of
vaccines administered: 3
WHEN THE BABY IS 4 TO 6 YEARS OLD
About the time the child starts kindergarten, he/she receives the final doses of the following vaccines:
􀂄 Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
􀂄 Inactivated poliovirus (IPV)
􀂄 Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
WARNING
By the time the baby is two years old, it has received 35 vaccines (includes 3 influenza
shots).
. . . . .
FROM THE DESK TOWARD OUR OWN HEALTH POLICY—CONCERNING VACCINATION - PAGE 11
􀂄 Chickenpox (varicella)
The administration of these eight (8) vaccines, appears to be a major effort of drug companies and
government health agencies to ensure that the child has learning disabilities when entering school so that
he/she can begin receiving additional behavioral and neurological drugs—manufactured by the same drug
companies that make the vaccines.
Many state governments require proof that the child has received these vaccinations before allowing the
him/her to enter school. At this point, the parents whose children do not have their “shots” up-to-date for
reasons other than defiance against vaccination, rush to pediatricians to overload their children with the
missed vaccines. This is a sad state of affairs. — number of vaccines administered: 8
UNFATHOMABLE AMOUNT OF POISONS
Here, we must first note that few people have seen a person who has not been poisoned by vaccines.
Therefore, we can only assess the dangers of vaccines in the context of a world where most people succumb
to disease, mental degeneration, and death between the ages of 40 and 70 years, or 4 to 7 decades of life,
respectively. No one can deny that this is a very short lifespan. Unfortunately, it is the only frame of
reference we have. This makes it easy for parents to accept the extreme vaccination of their children.
Given this fact, it is in our best interest to examine the extreme toxicity of vaccines. The 53 vaccines that
children receive by the time they reach the age of 6 years saturate their bodies with “secretive” geneticallyengineered
microorganisms that come from different species of animals and insects; industrial chemicals;
other types of chemicals; various kinds of drugs; and neurotoxic metals.
For a list of the “ingredients” contained in the vaccines named in this document, please visit my website at
http://www.kamuhammad.net or obtain a copy of my book, The Case Against Hepatitis B Vaccination.
THE PATH OF OVERCOMING MEDICAL TYRANNY
The United States Declaration of Independence is the official document which delineated the justification of
the thirteen colonies that comprised the United States of America to break from the aristocratic oligarchy,
the King of Great Britain, in 1776. This document is more often cited by name than actually read by the
citizens of America. If it were read, we would discover that the conditions that led to this nation’s separation
from tyrannical dictatorship persist today. This document opens with the following statement:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political
bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the
WARNING
By the time the child is six years old, it has received 53 vaccines (includes 4 annual influenza
shots).
PAGE 12 FROM THE DESK
Part 1: Examining the CDC’s National Vaccination Schedule
separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to
the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness...
A few statements later, it reads:
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all
having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let
facts be submitted to a candid world.
These “facts” are often referred to as “The Crimes of the King.” It is a long and detailed list of abuses so
disrespectful of human life that one wonders if the King’s rule could have ever been called a government.
The first crime listed is as follows:
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
Let us consider this in the context of all that we have learned regarding the mass drugging and vaccination
of our children, specifically the aim of those who use the power of “government” to do this.
LONG TRAIN OF ABUSES AND USURPATIONS
The following is a continuation from the second paragraph in the 1776 United States Declaration of
Independence:
...Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light
and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to
suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are
accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a
design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such
Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient
sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former
Systems of Government.
According to the above, it was quite known at that time that human beings are more apt to suffer under
evils that are “tolerable” than to stand up, on the basis of “right,” to abolish the systems through which
. . . . .
FROM THE DESK TOWARD OUR OWN HEALTH POLICY—CONCERNING VACCINATION - PAGE 13
such evils are borne and enacted. This has much to do with our awesome ability to adapt, which can work
for us or against us. These “sufferable evils” are those that are short of flagrant abuses and blatant murder,
yet the result is the same—the society becomes one of injustice, inequality, misery, and enslavement.
Today, these abuses are shrouded as “good” government, and they are gradually heaped on us, which
makes them tolerable. However, to endure these evils is worst than being outright slaughtered.
In the Holy Quran 2:191, it states:
...for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter.
For a mother to endure the pain of carrying a child for nine months, only to witness the destruction of her
baby’s physical and mental capabilities and potential, under medical tyranny and for the benefit of the
aristocratic families who regard us as mere “cattle,” may be worse than slaughtering the child. To live with
fear and grief, having your human rights persistently violated, with no apparent recourse or redress, is like
not living at all. At some point, we must make a stand.
How long is the train of abuses and usurpations of federal and state governments? What is usurpation? It is
“the act of taking by force and as though with justification.” When it comes to governments, abuses are
usually justified through the enactment of laws. Is this not how vaccinations are pushed on the citizenry—
being justified by government officials, who frame laws that work for the benefit of the drug companies they
serve?
Indeed, the mass drugging of our children facilitated by federal and state governments is indicative of a
“long train of abuses and usurpations” by these governments. This has placed the citizenry “under
absolute Despotism”— tyranny and terrorism. The precedence for thwarting the gross and inhumane
tyranny is already established in the Holy Quran and Bible, and in the United States Declaration of
Independence.
We will continue with this subject in Part II of this series.