30 January 2012

Why All 'Cholesterol Drugs' Are Very Dangerous

While annual sales of statin drugs have reached $29 billion a year, globally, new concerns are being raised by a broad range of health and consumer advocacy organizations around the world regarding the growing body of clinical research indicating they may be causing far greater harm than good.
Despite the success of statin drugs for lowering cholesterol, over 300 health problems have been linked to this chemical class of drugs in peer-reviewed clinical research found on the National Library of Medicine. 
GreenMedInfo.com, a biomedical research site, is offering a 63 page PDF for free and unlimited download, as part of a broad-based awareness campaign dedicated to informing consumers and health care practitioners alike of the danger represented by the indiscriminate and excessive use of this type of drug.
Natural Society, which has garnished a global following due to its hard-hitting investigative pieces into the role corporations play in adversely affecting environmental and human health, is spear-heading the dissemination of this message, and openly invites other organizations to join the cause.
The medical ethical principle of informed consent requires that patients be told the risks and benefits associated with their treatment. Until there is full awareness among the millions of statin users in this country, and abroad, that these drugs may be contributing to muscle damage, nerve damage, cancer, diabetes, and hundreds of other adverse health conditions, we believe the burden of proving them safe should be on the companies producing these products, as well as the regulatory agencies approving them for use, instead of the population being given them.
To become involved, copy and repost this release. Additional and/or media inquires:info@greenmedinfo.comcontact@naturalsociety.com

Cell Phones and Brains Don't Mix

Your Brain or Your Cell Phone- You must choose
January 27, 2012
satelitewaves 210x131 Cell Phones, EMF Negatively Altering Important Regions of the BrainA new Greek scientific study has demonstrated how frequency electromagnetic fields, namely cell phones, portable phones, WiFi, and wireless computer equipment, alter important protein changes in the brains of animals. Exposure to electromagnetic frequencies is the result of our advancing technologies, but it is important to study these effects so people know exactly what they’re dealing with in order to take the necessary precautionary measures.

Cell Phones, EMF Negatively Altering Important Regions of the Brain

The study, entitled “Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation,” was published in the journal Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. Important areas of the brain such as the hippocampus, cerebellum, and frontal lobe are regions responsible for learning, memory, and other functions. These areas are negatively impacted by microwave radiation, even at levels below the safety guidelines put in place by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation protection.
Researchers found that 143 proteins in the brain were negatively impacted by radio frequency radiation over a period of 8 months. A total of 3 hours of cell phone exposure were simulated over the 8 month time period, and the results showed that many neural function related proteins’ functional relationship changed the for worse.
It is known that short term exposure of microwaves exuded from a cell phone, depending on how far the antenna is from the head, can penetrate as much as 1 1/2 inches into the brain, but this study focuses more on the long term effects and how EMF impacts specific brain proteins. This provides new evidence of the potential relationship between EMF and health complications stemming from EMF such as headaches, dizziness, sleep disorders, and even tumors and Alzheimer’s disease.
Another study conducted by a Russian team of researchers also showed that EMF and cell phones cause significant long-term cognitive decline in children. It may be time for parents to re-determine if young children should really be using these devices with growing bodies and developing brains.
A number of foreign countries are attempting to adopt precautionary protocols to limit cell phone use in an attempt to mitigate the number of adverse effects they have on human health. In 2011, the WHO/IARC released a report stating that cell phone radiation may have a carcinogenic effect on humans. In fact, the World Health Organization actually said that cell phones are in the same cancer-causing category as lead, engine exhaust, and chloroform.
Explore More:
  1. Cell Phones, Brain Tumors and a Wired Earpiece
  2. How Cell Phones are Causing Health Complications, Protect Yourself
  3. These Cell Phones Can Emit 28 Times More Radiation
  4. Mobile Phones Cause ‘Five-Fold Increase in Brain Cancer Risk’
  5. Cell Phone Cancer Concerns: What Else Is a Danger in Your Home?
  6. WHO Says this Common Device is in the Same Category as Lead, Engine Exhaust, and Chloroform

The Dangers of Artificial Joint Replacements

The pain of arthritis in the hips and knees has led many to accept artificial joints as a solution. Now, studies indicate that they are not safe. The artificial hips introduce minute amounts of foreign material into the body that causes severe health problems- the poisoning effects on heart, lung, and muscles, not to mention the general toxicity to the body. Not only that, but the overall failure rate of the devices can be as high as 50% in just 6 years! These facts are not often disclosed to patients ahead of time. They only find out later when its too late. While it is possible to rebuild arthritic joints with very specific nutriton, the process is slow. It is better to avoid the development of joint disease through proper nutrition as a life-long practice.

Health warning over hip implants

Tens of thousands of patients who received hip replacements are at the centre of a major health alert over concerns they are poisoning their bodies.

Health warning over hip implants
Metal-on-metal implants were introduced in the UK in the 1990s when they were promoted as offering better mobility than replacements which use a metal ball and plastic socket 
Medical regulators are drawing up new advice for more than 30,000 Britons who have received “metal-on-metal” devices because of fears that they are even more dangerous than previously thought, a Sunday Telegraph investigation has found.
Problems occur with such devices when friction between the metal ball and cup causes minuscule metal filings to break off, which can seep into the blood and cause inflammation, destroying muscle and bone.
There are also concerns that the fragments could put the nervous system, heart and lungs at risk of being slowly poisoned.
The problems have been found to affect people of all ages but studies have found young and petite women are particularly at risk.
Patients with this type of hip replacement are already supposed to undergo annual checks, with scans and blood tests if doctors find symptoms that suggest metal leakage.
Advisers to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have decided the advice should go further due to concerns that the devices could cause “systemic toxicity” in the body.
The move comes as an investigation found:
  • Newly obtained research shows some hip replacements, which were withdrawn from the UK market in 2010, have far higher failure rates than had been known — of up to 50 per cent within six years.
  • Warnings from senior surgeons that although all patients given two specific implants should have been checked for metal leaks, not all have been contacted.
  • Nine legal firms are preparing compensation claims for 1,136 patients who suffered as a result of the two substandard devices.
A report from a conference of senior surgeons, held behind closed doors, describes the situation regarding all metal-on-metal hip replacements as “frightening” given the number of patients now suffering tissue reactions amid “component failure of catastrophic proportions”.
Metal-on-metal implants were introduced in the UK in the 1990s when they were promoted as offering better mobility than replacements which use a metal ball and plastic socket. They were seen as a better option for younger patients, who were likely to be more active and put more pressure on the joint.
In total, more than 40,000 patients in Britain have had them implanted. They include 10,000 who received two types of implants made by DePuy, a subsidiary of the health giant Johnson & Johnson, which were taken off the market in September 2010 because of declared “failure rates” of 12 to 13 per cent at five years.
More than 5,500 were given full hip replacements, with the rest given partial “resurfacing” operations with the devices. Now, a report on more than 500 patients, presented to the British Hip Society and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, has found failure rates of up to 50 per cent at six years for those given the full hip replacement.
Even among those given the more limited resurfacing treatment, one in four products failed within the same period, according to the study by surgeons in the North East.
Experts have not established why the DePuy models have such a high failure rate. In September 2010, the MHRA said orthopaedic surgeons should contact every patient given either a DePuy ASR or DePuy ASR XL model, to ensure they were monitored.
Any patients suffering abnormal pain or deteriorating hip function should have been offered tests to establish the levels of cobalt and chromium in their blood, and MRI or ultrasound scans to check for soft tissue reactions. If problems were found the device should be replaced, the alert said.
However, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose that the British Orthopaedic Assocation (BOA) has written to surgeons, expressing fears that not all patients who received the DePuy devices have been recalled for checks.
The letter, sent this month, says that records held by DePuy show that just over one third of patients who received the devices are recorded as having been recalled.
Professor Joe Dias, president of the BOA, said he understood that just 41 per cent of patients who received the implants were registered on this system.
He said it was possible that others had been recalled by hospitals, and undergone checks, without their details being centrally logged but that he was concerned that some had never been contacted.
The surgeon said that while private hospitals and large NHS units seemed to have been thorough in contacting patients, it was less clear whether small NHS units had done the same.
“My worry would be about cases where surgeons have retired, and no-one is following up on the patients they treated,” he said.
The implants’ manufacturers cannot contact patients directly, because they do not have access to their records.
In 2010, months before the DePuy recall, all 40,000 patients with metal-on-metal implants were told that they should undergo checks annually for at least five years.
The MHRA would not say when it would issue the new alert, or what it would say.
Stephen Cannon, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon for the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, said the type of damage caused by metal leakage could make replacement operations more difficult.
There was also concern that increased cobalt and chromium levels in the blood could be toxic to kidneys and, in the case of pregnant women, be passed on to the unborn child.
Experts expressed alarm that many people could remain unwittingly at risk from the products.
Peter Walsh from the patient safety charity Action against Medical Accidents said: “It is outrageous that this has been allowed to happen and that patients who are at risk from these products have not been warned.”
He said the system of regulation for medical devices required a radical shake-up, with the disclosures about the safety of hip replacements following the fiasco in which thousands of women received potentially dangerous PIP breast implants made of industrial silicone.
Massive legal action is now under way over the DePuy claims with 1,136 already represented by lawyers. Some individual compensation claims are likely reach six figures to take account for loss of earnings from patients facing repeated operations and disability, lawyers said.
A spokesman for DePuy said the company was working to provide patients with information and support. He said the company had no comment on how many patients who should have been recalled were logged by their system.
The study showing a 50 per cent failure rate was based on findings by one surgeon, and was not in line with the latest national figures, which had found a five-year revision rate of 17 per cent for the full hip replacement, he added.

28 January 2012

Law Forcing People into Experimental Vaccine Trials

AMA Paper Proposes Law Forcing People into Experimental Vaccine Trials Mike Barrett NaturalSociety January 27, 2012 How would you react if I were to tell you that you or your child were forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials? A paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor wants to do just that. It seems that the amount of current participants in current experimental vaccine trials is a bit too low, so why not create a federal law forcing each person to need to “opt-out” of experimental vaccine trials in an attempt to better society? AMA Proposes Law ‘Forcing’ Individuals to Participate in Experimental Vaccine Trials The proposed law is lunacy to say that least, stating that individuals must make a “mandated choice” to participate in such experimental trials. People shouldn’t be automatically enrolled in experimental trials or need to state in advance their decision to “opt-out”. Along with the law will come a customer list for big pharma, where each participant’s information will be shared with the pharmaceutical companies in order to gather trial and field test data. Of course this isn’t so different from how things operate now, where individuals are enrolled into big pharma’s database even if you exempt your child from vaccination. But if big pharma can’t produce enough positive data from those who actually want to volunteer for introducing a new product to the FDA for approval, they may just try to force people to participate or use a segment of the population that is ignorant to the laws surrounding the trials. What happens if these experimental vaccines cause harm? There are laws already set in place that essentially give vaccine manufacturers immunity to legal repercussions. That is to say that if your child is harmed from a vaccine, the vaccine manufacturers are not financially or morally responsible. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects vaccine manufacturers from any liability. Another example of similar medical and political tyranny is when a document was signed by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, where both vaccine makers and federal officials were granted complete legal immunity from any repercussions — regardless of whether or not the case is valid. Signed in July of 2009 by Sebelius, the document drew upon the provisions of a law signed in 2006 created for public emergencies. Granting swine flu vaccine makers legal protection and establishing a compensation fund, the legislation allows for vaccine makers to virtually disregard consumer safety. It is interesting to note that these laws are still needed even though health officials and vaccine makers tout vaccines as being 99.99% effective. But it isn’t so surprising, given the countless occasions in which vaccines have ruined both the lives of children and parents. Furthermore, previous attempts to test the anthrax vaccine on unsuspecting participants went sour after the public was alerted to the shocking history behind the anthrax vaccine. In a 2007 report by the CDC in conjunction with theVaccine Healthcare Centers of the Department of Defense and the watchdog group Government Accountability found that ”between 1 and 2 percent” of vaccinated military personnel experienced ”severe adverse events, which could result in disability or death.”As a result of public outrage, the government called off the testing. What would even happen if there were complications in future trials? Going by past history with other experimental vaccines, severe complications would probably just be hidden. The controversial trials of experimental AIDS vaccines that led to the loss of innocent lives have already been ignored by mainstream scientists and reporters. Even the scientists responsible for the deaths covered up the situation, failing to report the fatalities of their trials in order to prevent the public from finding out. Giving big pharma a guaranteed customer list of  individuals while simultaneously giving them immunity from lawsuits is quite the deal. Through activism and spreading the word, hopefully such a deal will not be made. Explore More: AIDS Vaccine Coming Soon | Experimental Vaccine Led to Censored Deaths Vaccine Makers Immune to Legal Repercussions Vaccine Information Week Starts Today, October 1st Genetically Modified HIV Vaccine Approved – Human Tests to Begin Shortly Scientists Announce a ‘Super Antibody’ Universal Flu Vaccine Institute of Medicine Admits Vaccine Dangers After Review The Natural Society Newsletter Email *

25 January 2012

Nutt in Charge of Magic Mushroom Study

Can psychedelic mushrooms be a treatment for depression and other psychological illnesses?  Dr Nutt of the Imperial C0llege is leading a study to see if the mushrooms can benefit  severely depressed patients. 

Prof Nutt stressed that people should not be tempted to conduct their own experiments with magic mushrooms.

Magic mushrooms 'could treat depression'

Magic mushrooms could be used as a treatment for depression, scientists hope.

Magic mushrooms could be used as a treatment for depression, scientists hope.
Magic mushrooms Photo: John Downing
A clinical trial of ''magic mushroom therapy'' could take place in the UK within a year following two ground-breaking studies.
Doctors plan to treat depressed patients who cannot be helped by modern drugs or behaviour-based psychotherapy with the active ingredient in hallucinogenic mushrooms.
Psilocybin would slowly be infused into their bloodstreams while they receive a carefully tailored ''talking therapy''.
The controversial trial is planned by Professor David Nutt, from Imperial College London, who three years ago was sacked as the Government's chief drug adviser.
Prof Nutt, former chairman of the Advisory Committee on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) clashed with then Home Secretary Alan Johnson after criticising the decision to toughen the law on cannabis.
The move to investigate psilocybin as a possible treatment for serious depression is linked to results from two far-reaching scientific studies.
In one, volunteers were given psilocybin infusions while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain scans.
The findings, reported today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, showed the drug disconnected two key ''hub'' regions of the brain with multiple connections to other areas.
One of these regions, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is known to be hyperactive in people with depression. The other, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) at the back of the brain, is thought to play a role in consciousness and self-identity.
The second study, soon to be published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, found that the magic mushroom chemical enhanced memories associated with positive emotions.
Scans showed that the memory experience was very ''real''. Activity was increased in brain regions that processed vision and other sensory information.
Speaking to journalists in London, Prof Nutt said the findings were ''a revelation''.
''Psychedelics are thought of as 'mind-expanding' drugs so it has commonly been assumed that they work by increasing brain activity, but surprisingly, we found that psilocybin actually caused activity to decrease in areas that have the densest connections with other areas.
''These hubs constrain our experience of the world and keep it orderly. We now know that deactivating these regions leads to a state in which the world is experienced as strange.''
It is the first time serious research has been carried out on the effects of ''psychedelic'' drugs for more than 50 years.
In the 1950s and 1960s, scientists investigating drugs such as LSD and psilocybin carried out studies on around 40,000 patients and published 1,000 papers.
Such work was brought to an abrupt halt when the drugs came to be seen as social evils and were made illegal.
''They got banned because they could be society changing,'' said Prof Nutt. ''There was great concern about that. Since then they've been virtually impossible to research.''
He said finding support for the new studies had been ''damned difficult''. Neither the Medical Research Council (MRC) nor the Wellcome Trust, Britain's biggest research charity, had been willing to fund them. And both Nature and Science, the two most prestigious scientific journals, refused to publish the findings.
Now the MRC is said to be showing interest in the planned clinical trial, which Prof Nutt believes could be undertaken this year with sufficient backing.
Twenty six patients with a history of serious depression which cannot be treated with drugs or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are expected to take part.
Half will be treated with psilocybin while trained psychotherapists prompt them to recollect happy memories and think positively.
Findings from the earlier research suggest the positive effects of the drug might be long-lasting, or even permanent.
After the treatment, the patients' progress will be monitored for a year. Their responses will be compared with those of a ''placebo group'' of another 13 patients given infusions of a salt solution containing no psilocybin.
For safety reasons, both the PNAS and British Journal of Psychiatry studies involved healthy volunteers unaffected by mental problems. All had also taken hallucinogenic drugs in the past without reacting badly to them.
Thirty participants took part in the PNAS study and ten in the British Journal of Psychiatry study.
Volunteers had a range of vivid and ''dreamlike'' experiences including seeing geometric patterns, an altered sense of time, and the ''Alice in Wonderland'' sensation of being either very big or very small.
They also underwent ''mystical'' transformations of the sort reported by Buddhist monks who practise deep meditation. This has been described as the ''ego dissolving'' and becoming ''one with the universe''.
One volunteer described the effect of psilocybin as being like ''kneeling before God''.
Prof Nutt stressed that people should not be tempted to conduct their own experiments with magic mushrooms.
''This is a research tool which may give us insights into how to treat depression,'' he said. ''I would strongly resist people self-medicating.''
Dr Kevin Healy, who chairs the Royal College of Psychiatrists' Faculty of Medical Psychotherapy, described the British Journal of Psychiatry study as ''interesting'' but added: ''We are clearly nowhere near seeing psilocybin used regularly and widely in psychotherapy practice.
''Although this study found that psilocybin enhanced autobiographical recollection in 10 healthy volunteers, we have no evidence that it would enhance a therapeutic response in patients, where the experienced relationship between patient and therapist is central to the therapeutic work.''

23 January 2012

Witch's Brew to Destroy a Brain

The addition of Aluminum and Fluoride together is a witch's brew that destroys 

the personality and the ability to think and remember. As the chart below indicates there is a skyrocketing incidence of Alzheimer's dementia over the recent years- years that coincide with the atmospheric spraying of aluminum compounds called chemtrails. With fluoride already in the water supply this is a perfect witch's brew to destroy the minds of an entire population with every breath and every sip. 

So what I want to know is, Who are the witches that have concocted this brew?

Aluminum + Fluoride = Alzheimer’s and 


(Chart taken from CDC National Vital Statistics 2000 report page 9)
Barbara H. Peterson
Chemtrails contain “the oxides of metals,” according to this geo-engineering patent. These substances are supposedly sprayed into our atmosphere for “beneficial” climate manipulation, or geo-engineering, and residue tests indicate excess aluminum oxide in water and soil after heavy chemtrailing. Fluoride is put in our water to “prevent tooth decay.” Both of these actions, geo-engineering and fluoridation, on the surface, appear to be beneficial, with only good intentions behind their implementation. Really! 
Aluminum is implicated in Alzheimer’s disease:
Certain aluminum compounds have been found to be an important component of the neurological damage characteristics of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Much research over the last decade has focused on the role of aluminum in the development of this disease. At this point, its role is still not clearly defined. Since AD is a chronic disease which may take a long time to develop, long-term exposure is the most important measure of intake. Long-term exposure is easiest to estimate for drinking water exposures. http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/alzheimers.htm
Subacute to chronic toxicity: Aluminum may be implicated in Alzheimers disease.” (Material Safety Data Sheet)
…and dementia:
Dementia develops when the parts of the brain that are involved with learning, memory, decision-making, and language are affected by one or more of a variety of infections or diseases. The most common cause of dementia is Alzheimer’s disease, but there are as many as 50 other known causes. Most of these causes are very rare.
Fluoride “enhances the bio-availability of aluminum,” allowing it to cross the blood-brain barrier easier, thus making it more toxic. The following study is from 1998:
The latest edition of the peer-reviewed medical journal, Brain Research, (vol.784:l998), reveals that aluminum-induced neural degeneration in rats is greatly enhanced when the animals were fed low doses of fluoride. The presence of fluoride enhanced the bio-availability of aluminum (Al) causing more aluminum to cross the blood-brain barrier and become deposited in the brain. The aluminum level in the brains of the fluoride-treated group was double that of the controls.
So why are we fluoridating our water supply? Considering that the secret is out about the effectiveness or lack thereof of fluoride to prevent tooth decay as referenced by the following report, how exactly is it that this potentially deadly combination has gone relatively unnoticed by the medical establishment? And probably the most important question of all is, why are we standing by and blindly accepting our poison without so much as a whimper?
Fluoride, Dentists “Magic Bullet” is Shooting Blanks
SOURCE: New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.
Poor Not Helped; Money Wasted; Kids in Dental Pain; Viable Alternatives Shunned 
New York – January 20, 2012 — Despite decades of water fluoridation in New York State, the Journal of the American Dental Association reports that emergency treatment for NYS toddlers’ severe tooth decay has grown substantially in numbers and costs, many require general anesthesia, (1)reports the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF) 
Fluoridation is touted as an effective cavity preventive that will save money. But this study and others proves it’s doing neither. 
In 72% fluoridated NYS, 25,622 children, under six-years-old, made cavity-related emergency dental visits from 2004 though 2008. Visits grew from 4,361 in 2004 to 5,683 in 2008. Seventy-five percent required general anesthesia, up from 35% in 2004. Total costs: $121 Million ($18.5 million in 2004 increased to $31.3 million in 2008), most borne by taxpayers. 
There is a limited number of dentists willing to treat patients younger than 6 and/or accept Medicaid” write the NYS researchers. 
More Statistics Show Fluoridation Fails New York State 
NYS Department of Health statistics reveal that, even when water is fluoridated, cavity-rates are extremely high in low-income third-graders. (2)For example: 
  • 85% of low-income third graders have tooth decay in WayneCounty(74% fluoridated)
  • 83% in OntarioCounty(61% fluoridated)
  • 82% in CayugaCounty(not fluoridated)
  • 82% in AlleghenyCounty(14% fluoridated)
  • 81% in LivingstonCounty(55% fluoridated)
  • 67% in SchuylerCounty(not fluoridated)
  • 58% in NassauCounty(not fluoridated) 
Fluoridation not only fails New YorkStatebut nationally children, the elderly and poor lack dental care.The General Accounting Office estimates that 6.5 million children aged 2 through 18 in Medicaid had untreated tooth decay in 2005.(3) 
Oral health complications may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. 
Annually, 164 million work hours and 51 million school hours are lost due to dental problems, according to the Instituteof Medicine. (4)Also, a 2008 study of the armed forces reveals 52% of new recruits had oral health problems needing urgent attention, reports the Pew Charitable Trust.
The American economy is hurt by dentists’ refusal to treat low-income Americans and by organized dentistry’s lobbying to outlaw cheaper dental care by viable dental professionals, such as dental therapists,” says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President. “Fluoridation is a false concept that must be abandoned.”
Past Studies Show that when fluoridation ceases so do cavities (5 )
  • Cavity rates decreased six years after fluoridation was stopped in Kupio, Finland.
  • Seven years after fluoridation ended in LaSalud, Cuba, cavity-free children increased dramatically
  • Following the cessation of water fluoridation in the East German cities, Chemnitzand Plauen, a significant fall in caries prevalence was observed.
  • After fluoridation ended in the East German cities, Spremberg and Zittau, cavities in 12-year-olds significantly decreased
  • During an 11-month fluoridation break in Durham, NC,cavity rates remained stable but dental fluorosis declined in children born during that period
  • In British Columbia, Canada, “the prevalence of caries decreased
    over time in the fluoridation-ended community while remaining unchanged
    in the fluoridated community.”
  • In 1973, the Dutch town of Tielstopped fluoridation. Decayed, missing and filled surfaces dipped in 15-year-olds. Never-fluoridated Culemborg’s 15-year-olds had 72% less cavities over the same period.
Beeber says, “The multi-billion dollar Pew Charitable Trust continues to waste its resources promoting fluoridation in Iowa, Arkansas, Austin and elsewhere with misinformation. However, we agree with their findings that ‘Support for CWF (Community Water Fluoridation) is soft, especially among the following groups…Those who report being more knowledgeable of Community Water fluoridation.’” 
Contact: Paul Beeber, Esq, 516-433-8882 nyscof@aol.com 
SOURCE: New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc.
Research shows that fluoridation does not reduce cavities but quite possibly increases them, yet we fluoridate our water, then spray aluminum from the sky to pollute that water, the soil, and air. We unwittingly ingest this aluminum, take a nice cool drink of fluoridated water, and end up a few years down the road wondering where we misplaced our minds and health. This is a two-part mix that leads to a crippling disease.
Our brains and nervous systems are under attack, and we end up paying dearly for the privilege of being poisoned to death. Insane? Yes. But very real. Whether you believe we are being subjected to an intentional depopulation agenda or simply hapless victims of reckless corporate greed, it’s happening! You can’t refute the facts. Aluminum + Fluoride = Alzheimer’s and Dementia. The combination is deadly. They know it, I know it, and now you know it.
© 2012 Barbara H. Peterson