Showing posts with label canned foods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canned foods. Show all posts

26 April 2010

Corporations Pressure Congress to Make Real Food Illegal

Having just returned from Growing Power in Milwaukee where I am taking a 5 month course in Commercial Urban Agriculture, it is shocking to the system to read the following article which indicates that Congress may be taking away one of the most basic of human rights - the right to have good food. The big corporations are trying to outlaw what they can never provide - good food, real food that is produced locally. All they can offer is fake food products that do not nourish and which are not sustainable. So the battle lines are drawn: people vs the corporations. Let's get ready to rumble! Our very survival is at stake.

Enjoy. Learn. Share.




Goodbye farmers markets, CSAs, and roadside stands

By Linn Cohen-Cole

The "food safety" bills in Congress were written by Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc. All are associated with the opposite of food safety. What is this all about then?


In the simplest terms, organic food and a rebirth of farming were winning. Not in absolute numbers but in a deep and growing shift by the public toward understanding the connection between their food and their health, between good food and true social pleasures, between their own involvement in food and the improvement in their lives in general, between local food and a burgeoning local economy.

Slow Food was right - limit your food to what comes from your region and from real farmers, and slow down to cook it and linger over it with friends and family, and the world begins to change for the better.

And as we face an unprecedented economic crisis, and it is hard to be sure what has value, one thing that always does is food. Which is why the corporations are after absolute control over it. But what obstacles to a complete lock on food do they face? All the people in this country who are "banking" on organic farming and urban gardens and most of all, everyone's deepening pleasure in and increasing involvement with everything about food.

Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands.

Those are things we not only all want, but things we are actively getting involved in, and things we very much need. And where they are truly good, they are growing.

The international financial corporations which have wreaked havoc around the world with astounding nonsensical "solutions" that are destructive of everyone but them, are brothers to the international agribusiness giants (Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc.) which are just as aggressively after their own form of "taking." Just seeds, animals, water, land.

And freedom.

Because human beings are by in large good and by in large incredibly resilient and clever, and left to their own devices - that is, free - they would handle this gargantuan financial stupidity the corporations brought us with NAFTA, CAFTA, GATT and all other globalized schemes (which they hope to eventually top off with CODEX). How? By being productive in real ways and locally. And farming is the solid ground under that. Farmers produce something of real value (something we used to take for granted), and from that base, businesses grow up. Local markets, local food processors, local seed companies, local tool and supply companies, local stores ... and an economy based on reality and something truly good for us, too, begins to grow.

So, look again at what has been exciting us - Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands. - and realize that they are not only wonderfully healthy but fun and naturally community building. And more, they are a real economy and deeply democratic - and just at a time we need something that works economically, that supports our democratic rebirth, and that protects food itself and our easy access to it.

And it is all those things that threaten the corporations ... which is why we now have these massive "fake food safety" bills in Congress. Everything is going under thanks to these fools, and they wish to be there like vultures to make sure that every drop of blood that can be sucked out of our resources and us, is theirs. To wit, they must get rid of such good and innocent things and yet truly powerful things as:

Farmers markets. Local farmers. Real milk. Fresh eggs. Vegetable stands.

And how will those who contaminate our country's food with pesticides, hormones, antibiotics and more, do that? Why, by setting standards for "food safety" that are so grotesquely and inappropriately and even cruelly applied to a local, independent farmers and ranchers that there is no way they can manage. Imagine your being faced with a 100 page IRS form and facing a million dollar a day penalty for screwing up. That would be in the ball park of the impossible complexity mixed with threat facing our farmers. Imagine having the government and corporations deciding every single thing you can do and must do in your kitchen and backing that up with the threat of 10 years in prison for screwing up - though you have never made anyone sick, and those corporations have. Imagine being surveilled 24 hours a day by GPS tracking devices that feed into ... a corporate data bank, one they have now moved out of the country so no one here can have legal access to see what is in it.

Imagine the devil himself - or a whole boardrooms of them, dressed in suits - defining the only safe and healthy food in this country as dangerous and burdening hard working farmers with more work then anyone could bear, while his own, their own, food is so dangerous at this point that in the last 10 years alone, diabetes has gone up 90%.

And how did they get this far with such a scheme to apply insane industrial standards to every farm in the country? Through fear of diseases and of outbreaks of food borne illnesses, both of which they cause themselves.

How it works: Tyson helps Bill Clinton get into office. Bill Clinton immediately and significantly lowers contamination standards for poultry as a thank you. And it is such contaminated waste from transnational poultry factories which is now implicated as the source of bird flu. Then fortunes on made on that fear. And then poultry industry uses the crisis they created to push out small farmers and take greater control than ever. Their mantra? Biodiversity not only be damned but be eliminated. And get rid of those damn farmers who protect it while we're at it.

The bills would require such a burdensome complexity of rules, inspections, licensing, fees, and penalties for each farmer who wishes to sell locally - a fruit stand, at a farmers market - no one could manage it. And THAT is the point. The whole dirty tricks point. The whole "be in tight control of everything needed for survival because it'll be worth a fortune" point.

So, if you like farmers markets, local farmers, fresh milk, fresh eggs, vegetables stands, and freedom, let your friends know that it's all on the line right now with those "fake food safety" bills brought to us with well-planned evil and more of it to come, by Monsanto, Cargill, Tysons, ADM, etc.

Slow Food reminds us of just where we need to be (and notice how much would help any local economy):

  • Forming and sustaining seed banks to preserve heirloom varieties in cooperation with local food systems;
  • Developing an "Ark of Taste" for each ecoregion, where local culinary traditions and foods are celebrated;
  • Preserving and promoting local and traditional food products, along with their lore and preparation;
  • Organizing small-scale processing (including facilities for slaughtering and short run products);
  • Organizing celebrations of local cuisine within regions (for example, the Feast of Fields held in some cities in Canada);
  • Promoting "taste education;"
  • Educating consumers about the risks of fast food;
  • Educating citizens about the drawbacks of commercial agribusiness and factory farms;
  • Educating citizens about the risks of monoculture and reliance on too few genomes or varieties;
  • Developing various political programs to preserve family farms;
  • Lobbying for the inclusion of organic farming concerns within agricultural policy;
  • Lobbying against government funding of genetic engineering;
  • Lobbying against the use of pesticides;
  • Teaching gardening skills to students and prisoners; and
  • Encouraging ethical buying in local marketplaces.

  • But we need to stop these bills first or we are left with no money from the financial bailout and no food from the food stealout.


    We need millions to be fighting this. Contact Eli Pariser at MoveOn moveon-help@list.moveon.org to tell him MoveOn is badly needed.

    And below, where Oped News offers a means of writing your local newspaper, take advantage of a chance to vent.





    Author's Bio: Met libertarian and conservative farmers and learned an incredible amount about farming and nature and science, as well as about government violations against them and against us all. The other side of the fence is nothing like what we've been taught to assume but great people with immense decency.

    21 April 2010

    Jamie's Food Revolution


    I don't watch a lot of TV, but this past week end, while traveling in Dallas, I was urged to watch Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution. I must say, it was very entertaining and was a very light-hearted but effective boost in the right direction toward better eating habits for Americans. While with TV one never can tell truth from fiction, allegedly he got 1000 people to come by Jamie's Kitchen to learn how to stir-fry some healthy food in order to win a bet with a skeptical local radio jock. Needless to say Jamie won the bet, but in the process educated a lot of people about better eating and even won over his arch critic to win the bet. Maybe popular culture can be used to push things in a positive direction. We'll see. Mykudos to Jamie!

    Enjoy. Learn. Share.
    Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution a hit in US
    Jamie Oliver's programme Food Revolution, in which the celebrity chef tries to persuade America's unhealthiest city to change its eating habits, has become one of the most popular shows in the US.

    21 Apr 2010

    An estimated 7.5 million viewers tuned in to the programme. The programme, which reduced Oliver to tears at one stage, was the joint most popular programme in America last Friday - and the No 1 alone in its 9pm time-slot.
    As well as proving a hit with viewers, American TV critics have also warmed to Oliver's passion for food.

    The Los Angeles Times said: "Oliver is eminently and instantly likable. He may in fact wind up being reality TV's most engaging star, equally comfortable talking to people and the camera."
    The New York Times review said Oliver's stunts had resulted in "entertaining" and "engrossing television".
    An estimated 7.5 million viewers tuned in to the programme, aired on the ABC channel.
    But the road to success in the US has not been easy for Oliver, 34.
    In one scene, he was reduced to tears as the residents of Huntington, West Virginia, ignored his healthy eating message.
    But a host of American celebrities including Ryan Seacrest, Justin Bieber, Ricky Gervais and P Diddy have signed his petition for change.
    He also made an appearance on The Oprah Show to promote the show.

    04 April 2010

    Cancer In A Can


    Need another reason not to eat or drink anything from a can?

    How about cancer, neurologic disorders, hyperactivity, behavioral problems, and hormone disruption.
    These are caused by the plastic chemical known as bisphenol A which is now throughout the environment. It makes the inside of cans slippery and 'protects' the contents from the toxic effects of aluminum. Incredibly it is used to make baby bottles soft and pliable, along with the super soft squeeze toys so common in today's households.




    Revealed: the nasty secret in your kitchen cupboard
    18 of 20 most popular tins made with controversial bisphenol A in lining
    By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent
    Some of Britain's best-known foods contain the controversial chemical bisphenol A, The Independent can reveal.
    Tins of Heinz baked beans,
    soup and beans, John West and Princes fish, and Napolina tomatoes are lined with a membrane containing bisphenol A, or BPA, a molecule of which is pictured top left. Other companies using it in their tins include the biggest retailers in the UK, Tesco, Sainsbury's and Asda, who use it for tins of tuna and sardines.
    Britain's
    Food Standards Agency (FSA) has given the chemical the all-clear, in contrast to the US Food and Drug Administration, which in January expressed concern over its impact on the brains and development of young children and said it was "taking reasonable steps to reduce human exposure" to it in the food supply. After the American U-turn, the EU-funded European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) launched and is still carrying out a review of BPA.
    Some scientists fear that exposure to minute doses of the chemical in food and other products may be damaging to the health of individuals.
    BPA is an endocrine disruptor that interrupts hormones and, in laboratory experiments on animals, has been linked with breast cancer, prostate cancer, hyperactivity and other metabolic and behavioural problems, diseases which are all on the rise in the West. But the plastics and chemicals industries insist its use is safe and accuse campaigners of misleading the public, pointing to industry-funded studies involving large numbers of rodents that have shown no harm.
    At stake is the future of one of the highest production volume chemicals in the world. BPA is widely used to harden the plastic casings of mobile phones and computers and makes baby bottles shatterproof. In food products, it commonly lines the inside of cans and tins to protect their contents from being contaminated by the metal.
    To establish its prevalence in food, The Independent surveyed manufacturers of the UK's 20 best-selling tinned foods. Although it is not stated on tins, BPA is used in the linings of 18 out of the 20 products, which have combined annual sales of £921m, or 43 per cent of UK tinned food sales. All the companies said their products were safe because the levels of BPA leaching out into food were so low that they were safe.
    However Heinz said it was looking to phase out BPA once alternatives could be found. In a statement, the US tinned food
    giant said: "Although UK and European food authorities have stated that minute levels of BPA in can coatings are safe, Heinz remains committed to moving to alternatives. For beans, pasta and many soups a protective coating is only applied to the can ends which would not provide any trace of BPA or would be at the limit of detection of a few parts per billion. This compares with the safe legal limit of 600 parts per billion. Heinz continues to advance research into alternative coatings in response to consumer opinion but safety remains our first priority before making any changes."
    Princes, the tinned fish company which also owns the Napolina brand, said: "The inside of most food cans requires a protective coating. Bisphenol A (BPA) is used industry wide as a component part of this coating. It is an approved food contact material and there is guidance from both the FSA and the EFSA regarding its use."
    John West said: "Some of John West's tinned products are lined with a lacquer that contains a derivate of Bisphenol. By contact tiny amounts of Bisphenol-A are able to migrate within the EU regulation limits." Baxters, the Scottish soup-maker, said its cans contained "minute" amounts of BPA at levels "substantially lower" than that approved by the EFSA.
    Tesco, Sainsbury's and Asda, and other producers such as Premier Foods, General Mills and Hormel Foods, the US company which makes Spam, insisted their tins were safe and produced in accordance with current safety regulations.
    Tinned drinks also include a membrane with BPA. A spokeswoman for Coca-Cola UK confirmed: "We use BPA in the linings of our cans. Our top priority is to ensure the safety and quality of our products and packaging through rigorous standards that meet or exceed government requirements... All available scientific evidence and testing shows that drinks in aluminium and steel cans are safe."
    According to the FSA, studies have shown that BPA is not harmful to laboratory animals when fed in amounts equivalent to more than exposure levels in humans. However the last review of the safety of BPA in tinned foods in Britain was eight years ago by the Committee on Toxicity. Since then several peer-reviewed scientific studies have detected low-dose effects on animals. These low-dose effects are not currently recognised by British or European regulators.
    Breast Cancer UK is among several campaigning organisations which wants to see reductions in BPA used in food and other products. Claire Dimmer, chair of trustees, said: "We welcome the research that the food packaging industry is undertaking to find potential BPA alternatives. But these efforts need to be stepped up significantly. " She called on manufacturers to introduce clear BPA labelling – "otherwise it's impossible for us to make a decision on ways of limiting our and our families exposure to this chemical."
    TOP 20: BRITAIN'S MOST POPULAR TINNED FOODS
    Brand / Maker/ Contains BPA?
    1. Heinz classic soup / Heinz / YES
    2. John West canned fish / John West / YES
    3. Heinz Baked Beans / Heinz / YES
    4. Princes canned fish / Princes / YES
    5. Napolina tomato products / Princes / YES
    6 Branston Baked Beans / Premier Foods / YES
    7. Tesco canned fish / Tesco / YES
    8. Sainsbury canned fish / Sainsburys / YES
    9.
    Green Giant Niblets / General Mills / YES
    10. Princes Corned Beef / Princes / YES
    11. Fray Bentos canned pies / Premier Foods / YES
    12. Heinz Big Soup / Heinz / YES
    13. Baxters Favourites Soup / Baxters / YES
    14. Tesco Value tomato products / Tesco / NO
    15. Asda canned fish / Asda / YES
    16. Spam Chopped Ham/Pork / Spam / YES
    17. Heinz Long Spaghetti / Heinz / YES
    18 Heinz Beans with Pork Sausages / Heinz / YES
    19 Tesco Value canned fish / Tesco / YES
    20. Tesco
    canned fruit / Tesco / NO