07 January 2013

How to Avoid GMO Foods

People who still eat packaged food products have a very difficult time avoiding GMO. Food products produced in corporate factories and packaged with labels are high-risk GMO foods. Natural whole foods that come unlabeled are low-risk GMO, almost NO RISK if its organic. Here is a fairly comprehensive useful chart and list of food brands to help avoid unwanted GMO's.

How To Avoid Food Brands Made With
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

This section is compiled by Frank M. Painter, D.C.
Send all comments or additions to:
    Frankp@chiro.org

Thanks to the Institute for Responsible Technology for access to this article!


Genetic Engineering (GE) or Genetic Modification (GM) of food involves the laboratory process of artificially inserting genes into the DNA of food crops or animals. The result is called a genetically modified organism or GMO. GMOs can be engineered with genes from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals, or even humans. Most Americans say they would not eat GMOs if labeled, but unlike most other industrialized countries, the U.S. does not require labeling.

This Non-GMO Shopping Guide is designed to help reclaim your right to know about the foods you are buying, and help you find and avoid GMO foods and ingredients.

Tips for avoiding GM crops
  • TIP #1: BUY ORGANIC
    Certified organic products are not allowed to contain any GMOs.  Therefore, when you purchase products labeled “100% organic,” “organic,” or “made with organic ingredients,” all ingredients in these products are not allowed to be produced from GMOs. For example, products labeled as “made with organic ingredients” only require 70% of the ingredients to be organic, but 100% must be non-GMO.
  • TIP #2: LOOK FOR“NON-GMO” LABELS
    Companies may voluntarily label products as “non-GMO.” Some labels state “non-GMO” while others spell out “Made Without Genetically Modified Ingredients.” Some products limit their claim to only one particular “At-Risk” ingredient such as soy lecithin, listing it as “non-GMO.”
  • TIP #3: AVOID AT-RISK INGREDIENTS
    Avoid products made with any of the crops that are GM. Most GM ingredients are products made from the “Big Four:” corn, soybeans, canola, and cottonseed, used in processed foods. Some of the most common genetically engineered Big Four ingredients in processed foods are:
    Corn
    Corn flour, meal, oil, starch, gluten, and syrup
    Sweeteners such as fructose, dextrose, and glucose
    Modified food starch*

    Soy
    Soy flour, lecithin, protein, isolate, and isoflavone
    Vegetable oil* and vegetable protein*

    Canola
    Canola oil (also called rapeseed oil)

    Cotton
    Cottonseed oil

    Sugar
    Anything not listed as 100% cane sugar

    *May be derived from other sources

    In addition, GM sugar beet sugar recently entered the food supply. Look for organic and non-GMO sweeteners, candy and chocolate products made with 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar, to avoid GM beet sugar.

  • TIP #4: BUY PRODUCTS LISTED IN THIS SHOPPING GUIDE
    Keep this Guide with you whenever you shop. Store it inside your reusable shopping bag, put it into your coupon holder or check book, or leave it in your car.

FRUITS & VEGETABLES

Very few fresh fruits and vegetables for sale in the U.S. are genetically modified. Novel products such as seedless watermelons are NOT genetically modified. Small amounts of zucchini, yellow crookneck squash, and sweet corn may be GM. The only commercialized GM fruit is papaya from Hawaii—about half of Hawaii's papayas are GM.


MEAT, FISH & EGGS

No genetically modified fish, fowl, or livestock is yet approved for human consumption. However, plenty of non-organic foods are produced from animals raised on GM feed such as grains. Look for wild rather than farmed fish to avoid fish raised on genetically modified feed, and 100% grass-fed animals.

Meat and Fish: Non-GMO

Vital Choice
Organic Prairie



Eggs: Non-GMO

Egg Innovations Organic
Eggland's Best Organic
Land O'Lakes Organic
Nest Fresh Organic
Organic Valley
Pete and Jerry's Organic Eggs
Wilcox Farms Organic




ALTERNATIVE MEAT PRODUCTS

Many alternative meat products are processed and include ingredients that can be genetically engineered, so give the ingredient lists close attention to avoid the Big Four at-risk ingredients, especially soy.

Non-GMO

365 Brand (Whole Foods)
Amy's
Bountiful Bean
Sunshine Burger
The Simple Soyman
Vitasoy
Wildwood
White Wave

May contain GMO ingredients

Boca, unless labeled organic (Kraft)
Gardenburger
Morningstar Farms, Morningstar Farms Natural Touch, unless labeled organic (Kellogg)


BABY FOODS & INFANT FORMULA

Milk or soy protein is the basis of most infant formulas. The secret ingredients in these products are often soy or milk from cows injected with rbGH. Many brands also add GMO-derived corn syrup, corn syrup solids, or soy lecithin.

Non-GMO

Baby's Only
    (certified organic products)
Earth's Best
Gerber products
HAPPYBABY
Mom Made Meals
Organic Baby
Plum Organics

May contain GMO ingredients

Beech-Nut
Enfamil
Good Start
Nestlé
Similac/Isomil


DAIRY PRODUCTS & ALTERNATIVE DAIRY PRODUCTS

Some U.S. dairy farms inject the genetically engineered hormone rbGH, also called rbST, into their cows to boost milk production. Organic dairy products are rbGH-free and do use GM grains as feed. Products with a label that indicates cows free of rbGH or rbST may come from cows fed GM feed. Many alternative dairy products are made from soybeans and may
contain GM materials.
Dairy Products: Non-GMO

Certified Organic
Alta Dena Organics
Butterworks Farm
Harmony prHills Dairy
Horizon Organic
Morningland Dairy
Natural by Nature
Organic Valley
Radiance Dairy
Safeway Organic Brand
Seven Stars Farm
Straus Family Creamery
Stonyfield Farm
Wisconsin Organics
Nancy's Organics

Produced Without rbGH

National
Nancy's Natural Dairy
Alta Dena
Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream
Brown Cow Farm
Crowley Cheese of Vermont
Franklin County Cheese
Grafton Village Cheese
Great Hill Dairy
Lifetime Dairy

West Coast
Alpenrose Dairy
Berkeley Farms
Clover Stornetta Farms
Joseph Farms Cheese
Sunshine Dairy Foods
Tillamook Cheese
Wilcox Family Farms

Midwest and Gulf States
Chippewa Valley Cheese
Erivan Dairy Yogurt
Promised Land Dairy
Westby Cooperative Creamery

East Coast
Blythedale Farm Cheese
Crescent Creamery
Derle Farms (milk with
   “no rbST” label only)
Erivan Dairy Yogurt
Farmland Dairies
Oakhurst Dairy
Wilcox Dairy (rbST-free
   dairy line only)



Alternative Dairy Products: Non-GMO

Belsoy
EdenSoy
Imagine Foods/Soy Dream
Nancy's Cultured Soy
Pacific Soy
Silk
Soy Delicious
Sun Soy
Stonyfield Farm O'Soy
Tofutti
VitaSoy/Nasoya
WestSoy
WholeSoy
Yves The Good Slice
Zen Don

May contain GMO ingredients

Colombo (General Mills)
Dannon
Kemps (aside from
   “Select” brand)
Land O' Lakes
Parmalat
Sorrento
Yoplait (General Mills)





May contain GMO ingredients

8th Continent


GRAINS, BEANS & PASTA

Other than corn, no GM grains are sold on the market. Look for 100-percent wheat pasta, couscous, rice, quinoa, oats, barley, sorghum, and dried beans (except soybeans).

Prepared Meals: Non-GMO

Annie's Natural Pasta
Bob's Red Mill (organic line)
Eden certified organic grains
Kamut
Lundberg Family Farms
Sunridge Farms
Vita-Spelt pasta

Packaged Meals: Non-GMO
Amy's
Annie's Homegrown certified
   organic macaroni & cheese
Casbah (Hain-Celestial)
Dr. McDougall's Right Foods
Fantastic Foods
Ian's Natural Foods
Lotus Foods
Lundberg Farms Rice Sensations
Organic Planet
Seeds of Change certified
   organic boxed meals
May Contain GMO ingredients
Betty Crocker meals (General Mills)
Knorr (Unilever)
Kraft Macaroni & Cheese
Lipton meal packets (Unilever)
Near East (Quaker)
Pasta Roni and Rice-a-Roni meals (Quaker)


CEREALS AND BREAKFAST BARS

Cereals and breakfast bars are very likely to include GMO ingredients, because they are often made with corn and soy products.
Non-GMO:

Ambrosial Granola
Barbara's (organic line)
Cascadian Farms
Eden
EnviroKidz
Golden Temple
Grandy Oats
Health Valley (organic line)
Lundberg® Purely Organic
Rice Cereal
Nature's Path
Nonuttin'
Omega Smart Bars
Peace Cereal Organic
Simple Sweets
Sunridge Farms
Ruth¹s
May Contain GMO Ingredients

Betty Crocker meals
   (General Mills)
Knorr (Unilever)
Kraft Macaroni & Cheese meals
Lipton meal packets (Unilever)
Near East (Quaker)
Pasta Roni and Rice-A-Roni
   meals (Quaker)
General Mills
Kellogg
Post (Kraft)
Quaker


BAKED GOODS

While baking ingredients such as wheat flour, rice, kamut, and oats are not genetically modified, many packaged breads and bakery items contain other GMO ingredients such as corn syrup.
Non-GMO:

Arrowhead Mills (organic line)
Bakery on Main
Bob's Red Mill (organic line)
Dr. McDougall's Right Foods
Dr Oetker Organics
French Meadow
Natural Ovens Bakery
   (organic line)
Nature's Path
Rudi's Organic Bakery
Rumford Baking Powder

May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Aunt Jemima (Pinnacle Foods)
Betty Crocker (General Mills)
Calumet Baking Powder (Kraft)
Duncan Hines (Pinnacle Foods)
Hungry Jack (Smucker's)
Pillsbury (Smucker's)


FROZEN FOODS

Many frozen foods are highly processed. Keep an eye out for the Big Four at-risk ingredients and stay away from frozen foods that contain them, unless they are marked organic or non-GM.

Non-GMO:

A.C. LaRocco
Amy's Kitchen
Cascadian Farms Organic frozen
   meals and vegetables
Cedarlane
Helen's Kitchen
Ian's Natural Foods
Linda McCartney frozen meals
Mom Made Meals
Plum Organics Kids
The Simple Soyma
May Contain GMO Ingredients

Boca, unless labeled organic
   (Kraft)
Celeste (Pinnacle Foods)
Eggo Waffles (Kellogg)
Gardenburger
Green Giant frozen meals
   (General Mills)
Healthy Choice (ConAgra)
Kid's Cuisine (ConAgra)
Lean Cuisine (Nestle)
Marie Callender's (ConAgra)
Morningstar Farms, Morningstar
   Farms Natural Touch, unless
   labeled organic (Kellogg)
Rosetto Frozen Pasta (Nestle)
Stouffer's (Nestle)
Swanson (Campbell's)
Tombstone (Kraft)
Totino's (Smucker's)
Voila! (Birds Eye/Unilever)


SOUPS, SAUCES & CANNED FOODS

Many soups and sauces are highly processed, so give the ingredient lists close attention to avoid the Big Four at-risk ingredients.

Soups: Non-GMO

Amy's
Fantastic Foods
Health Valley/Westbrae
Imagine Natural
Natural/Hain
ShariAnn's Organics
Walnut Acres certified organic



Sauces/Salsas: Non-GMO 

Amy's (organic line)
Annie's Natural
Eden
Emerald Valley Kitchen
Green Mountain Gringo &
   certi?ed-organic salsa
Muir Glen Organic pasta sauce
   & salsa
Seeds of Change certi?ed-
    organic pasta sauce
Walnut Acres certi?ed-organic
    pasta sauce


Canned Food: Non-GMO 

Amy's
Annie's Natural
Eden
ShariAnn's certified organic beans
Westbrae certified organic beans
Yves Veggie Cuisine (Hain Celestial)
May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Chef Boyardee, Healthy Choice
   (ConAgra)
Campbell's products (including
   Healthy Request, Chunky,
   Simply Home, and Pepperidge
   Farm)
Hormel products
Progresso products
   (General Mills)


Sauces/Salsas: May Contain GMO Ingredients

Bertolli (Unilever)
Chi-Chi's (Hormel)
Classico (Heinz)
Del Monte
Healthy Choice (ConAgra)
Hunt's (ConAgra)
Old El Paso (General Mills)
Pace (Campbell's)
Prego (Campbell's)
Ragu (Unilever)



May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Chef Boyardee
Dinty Moore, Stagg, Hormel
   (Hormel)
Franco-American (Campbell's)


CONDIMENTS, OILS, DRESSINGS & SPREADS

Unless labeled explicitly, corn, soybean, cottonseed, and canola oils probably contain genetically modified products. Choose pure olive, coconut, sesame, sunflower, safflower, almond, grapeseed, and peanut oils. Also choose preserves, jams, and jellies with cane sugar, not corn syrup.
Non-GMO 

Annie's
Bountiful Bean
Bragg's liquid amino
Carrington Farms Flax Seed
Crofter's Organic
Drew's salad dressing
Eden
Emerald Cove
Emerald Valley Kitchen
Emperor's Kitchen
Follow Your Heart
Harvest Moon Mushrooms
Ian's Natural Foods
I.M. Health SoyNut Butters
Maranatha Nut Butters
Miso Master
Muir Glen organic
   tomato ketchup
Nasoya
Newmans Own Organic
Ruth¹s
Spectrum oils and dressings
SushiSonic Asian Condiments
The Simple Soyman
Vegan by Nature Buttery Spreads
Vigoa Cuisine
Wholemato

May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Crisco (Smucker's)
Del Monte
Heinz
Hellman's (Unilever)
Kraft condiments and dressings
Mazola
Pam (ConAgra)
Peter Pan (ConAgra)
Skippy (Unilever)
Smucker's (except their “Simply
   100% Fruit” line of preserves)
Wesson (ConAgra)
Wish-Bone (Unilever)


SNACK FOODS

Look for snacks made from wheat, rice, or oats, and ones that use sunflower or safflower oils. There is no GM popcorn on the market, nor is there blue or white GM corn.
Snacks: Non-GMO 

Barbara's (organic line)
Bearitos/Little Bear Organics
   (Hain Celestial)
Eco-Planet
Eden
Garden of Eatin'
Grandy Oats
Hain Pure Snax/Hain Pure Foods
Health Valley
Ian's Natural Foods
Kettle Foods
Kopali Organics
Late July Organic Snacks
Mary's Gone Crackers
Nature's Path Organic
Namaste Foods
Newman's Own Organics
   & Newman's Own
   (except salad dressing)
Simple Sweets
Sunridge Farms



Energy Bars: 

Clif Bar  
Genisoy Bars
Lara Bar
Luna Bar              
Macrobars
Nature's Path
Nutiva
Odwalla
Optimum Energy Bar
Organic Food Bar
Weil by Nature's Path Organic
May Contain GMO Ingredients 

FritoLay (Lay's, Ruffles, Doritos,
   Cheetos, Tostitos)
Hostess Products
   (Interstate Brands)
Keebler (Kellogg's)
Kraft (Nabisco, Nilla Wafers,
   Oreos, Ritz, Nutter Butter,
   Honey Maid, SnackWells,
   Teddy Grahams, Wheat
   Thins, Triscuit)
Pepperidge Farm (Campbell's)
Pringles
Quaker Oats Company











May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Balance Bar
Nature Valley snack bars and
   granola bars (General Mills)
Nabisco Bars (Kraft)
PowerBar (Nestle)
Quaker Granola Bars


CANDY, CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS, & SWEETENERS

Many sweeteners, and products like candy and chocolate that contain them, can come from GMO sources. Look for organic and non-GMO sweeteners, candy and chocolate products made with 100% cane sugar, evaporated cane juice or organic sugar to avoid GM beet sugar, and watch out for soy lecithin in chocolates and corn syrup in candies.

The sweetener aspartame is derived from GM microorganisms. It is also referred to as NutraSweet® and Equal® and is found in over 6,000 products, including soft drinks, gum, candy, desserts, yogurt, tabletop sweeteners, and some pharmaceuticals such as vitamins and sugar-free cough drops.
Chocolate: Non-GMO 

Chocolove
Endangered Species Chocolate
Green & Black's Organic Chocolate
Kopali Organics
Nonuttin'
Newman's Own
Nonuttin'



Candy: Non-GMO 

Jelly Belly
Pure Fun Confections
Reed's Crystallized Ginger
   candy (certified organic)

St. Claire Organic
Sunridge Farms



Sweeteners: Non-GMO 

Eden
Sweet Cloud
Nonuttin
Newman¹s Own
May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Hershey's
Nestlé (Crunch, Kit Kat, Smarties)
Toblerone (Kraft)
Ghiradelli¹s Chocolate






May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Hershey's
Lifesaver (Kraft)
Nestlé


SODAS, JUICES & OTHER BEVERAGES

Most juices are made from GMO-free fruit (avoid papaya though, as it could be GMO), but the prevalence of corn-based sweeteners—e.g. high-fructose corn syrup—in fruit juices is cause for concern. Many sodas are primarily comprised of water and corn syrup. Look for 100-percent juice blends.
Non-GMO 

After the Fall organic juices
Big Island Organics
Blue Sky
Cascadian Farm
Crofters Organic
Eden
Frey Vinyards
Odwalla
Organic Valley
Quinoa Gold
Mixerz All Natural Cocktail Mixers
R.W. Knudsen organic juices
   and spritzers (Smucker's)
Santa Cruz Organic (Smucker's)
Sea20 Organic Energy Drink
Teeccino Herbal Caffe
Walnut Acres Organic Juices

May Contain GMO Ingredients 

Coca-Cola (Fruitopia, Minute
   Maid, Hi-C, NESTEA)
Hansen Beverage Company
Hawaiian Punch
   (Procter and Gamble)
Kraft (Country Time, Kool-Aid,
   Crystal Light, Capri Sun, Tang)
Libby's (Nestlé)
Ocean Spray
Pepsi (Tropicana, Frappuccino,
   Gatorade, SoBe, Dole)
Sunny Delight (Procter and
   Gamble)

Special Note: This guide was compiled based on company statements, not genetic testing. Any product labeled as Non-GMO indicates that its manufacturing process is designed to avoid GMOs, but consumers should be aware that GM contamination is possible due to natural pollen movement, weather events, seed contamination, or human error. Hence there is no guarantee such products are 100% free of GMOs.


INVISIBLE GM INGREDIENTS

Processed foods often have hidden GM sources (unless they are organic or declared non-GMO). The following are ingredients that may be made from GMOs.


Aspartame
baking powder
caramel color
cellulose
citric acid
cobalamin
   (Vitamin B12)
corn gluten
corn masa
corn oil
corn syrup
cornmeal
cornstarch
cyclodextrin
cystein
dextrin
dextrose
diacetyl
diglyceride
fructose
fructose
   (crystalline)
glucose
glutamate
glutamic acid
gluten
glycerides
glycerin
glycerol
glycerol
   monooleate
glycine
hemicellulose
high fructose
   corn syrup
   (HFCS)
hydrogenated
   starch
hydrolyzed vegetable protein
inositol
invert sugar
   (colorose or inversol)
tamari
isoflavones
lactic acid
lecithin
leucine
lysine
malitol
maltodextrin
maltose
mannitol
methylcellulose
milo starch
modified starch
monosodium
   glutamate MSG
oleic acid
Phenylalanine
phytic acid
sorbitol
soy flour
soy isolates
soy lecithin
soy protein
starch
stearic acid
inverse syrup
tempeh
threonine
tocopherols
   (Vitamin E)
tofu
trehalose
triglyceride
vegetable fat
vegetable oil
Vitamin B12
Vitamin E
xanthan gum


Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) although usually derived from corn, is probably not GM because it is not likely made in North America.

To learn more about GMOs, consult the books Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods by Jeffrey M. Smith or Your Right to Know: Genetic Engineering and the Secret Changes in Your Food by Andrew Kimbrell.   Information on GMOs is also available at www.centerforfoodsafety.org and  www.HealthierEating.org.

Copyright 2008 Center for Food Safety and Institute for Responsible Technology. No part of this booklet may be reproduced in any form without written permission from both parties. For large print quantities or electronic distribution requests, contact: info@responsibletechnology.org or info@centerforfoodsafety

March 2009 edition 

04 January 2013

Radiation Pushes Japan Death Rate to New Heights

Is Fukushima A Factor In Japan’s
Record Deaths In 2011-12?


By Yoichi Shimatsu
 Exclusvise to Rense.com
1-2-12
 
IThe CIA’s projected Japan death rate for 2012 is shown in this chart. Instead, after the Fukushima disaster, the actual mortality rate is the same as 2011.

Contravening the Japanese government’s claim that not a single person has yet to die from Fukushima radiation, national mortality figures just released to the press by the Ministry of Health and Welfare presents undeniable data confirming a record high death rate since the 3.11 disaster.

A close independent look at the mortality data from years 2011 and 2012 suggests at least 6,000 deaths, and likelier many thousands more, were triggered or abetted by radioactive contamination of the nation’s food supply and living environment.

The Health Ministry cites the leading causes of death as cancer, heart disease, pneumonia and cerebrovascular disorders (hemorrhaging and clots in the brain). These apparent causes, in many cases, could well have been just the final blow to a patient whose health was seriously compromised by radiation exposure. Nuclear isotopes, especially when ingested through food or via the lungs, can be the primary causal factor behind the deterioration of the immune system, nerves and muscles, making the patient far more vulnerable to organ failure or attack by pathogens.

Japan also saw a record drop in the national birth rate, with only 1,033,000 newborns, a fall of 18,000 since the previous year. The substantial decrease in births indicates the reluctance of young couples to parent children in a country inundated with radiation, which already affects maternal health during the prenatal period. The combination of more deaths and a declining birth rate resulted in Japan’s population shrinking by 212,000 individuals over the past 12 months - a historic record low.

Numbers Don’t Lie

The record year for mortality in Japan, 2011, witnessed 1,253,066 deaths, not counting the estimated 2,700 tsunami victims who are missing and presumed dead. Included in the annual total are 15,878 fatalities from the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, based on figures from the National Police Agency.

Now, if the casualties from the Tohoku disasters are subtracted from the 2011 annual total, then 1,243,188 people died of causes other than the quake and tidal wave. That figure is lower than the Health Ministry’s estimate for the number of deaths in 2012, which stands at 1,245,000.

Therefore, the past year was a deadliest 12-month period ever in terms of non-disaster fatalities.  This rise in the death toll cannot be attributed to a major disaster, contagion (such as the avian influenza outbreaks of previous years) or major industrial accident. The record number of deaths in 2012 is going unexplained by the Health Ministry, which dares not inquire into the actual underlying cause.

Are we here making a rush to judgment in linking the record mortality rate to radiation effects from the Fukushima meltdowns? Absolutely not ­ the hard data points to exactly the missing factor of radiation.

Defying a Trend

For the many readers who dislike arithmetic, either bear with these calculations or skip down to the later sections. In the four years from 2007 to 2010, national mortality increased by a steady rate of 0.28 deaths per 1,000 people.

What accounts for the rising trend of fatalities? That four-year period witnessed the deaths of elderly patients above 70 years of age whose childhoods coincided with the deprivation of World War II and the immediate postwar years. Many suffered from chronic poor health due to malnutrition, tuberculosis and hepatitis during their youth.

The grim reaper removed many of these less-than-healthy seniors from the population, leaving a relatively fit cohort of the elderly - a majority of them women who were not exposed as much as their husbands to postwar occupational risks (industrial chemicals, pesticides, heavy smoking, tainted alcohol, and so forth). In 2011, the mortality rate slowed as it reached a peak, indicating a trend reversal would start in 2012, considering the better health of survivors in a society known for its high life expectancy.

For this reason, the CIA in its World Fact Book (January 2011, before the Tohoku disaster) projected Japan’s death rate for 2012 to radically decline from a 2011 peak of 10.09 per thousand people down to 9.15, or a full point lower than the 2007 rate. If the huge drop in births since the Fukushima disaster did not factor in, the Japanese population should have registered a slight increase in 2012.

Converted into raw numbers, total deaths in 2012 could reasonably be expected to decrease to less than 1,239.00, or about 6,000 fewer than Health Ministry’s current estimate. The much-anticipated trends of decreasing mortality and population growth did not happen, not after Fukushima.

Radiation as Probable Cause

The disparity of 6,000 more deaths that anticipated point to a hidden cause for these unexpected fatalities. Again, without any major pandemic or disaster over the past 12 months, the only external factor that can account for the spike in deaths is radiation exposure.

That number is an extremely conservative estimate, based on a rather cautious CIA projection for a declining mortality rate. Seen from another angle, 6,000 deaths outnumber the toll of every contagion since the typhoid outbreaks that swept Japan in the 19th century.

How did radiation kill these thousands of Japanese? From my past discussions with Japanese cardiologists, some 7,000 people in Japan die annually of heart disease, either from a failed valve or spasmodic seizure. Due to their low average body weight compared with other races, elderly Japanese tend to have a much smaller heart size, in some cases hardly larger than a bird’s, making them more vulnerable to external factors. Cesium, when ingested and circulated through the blood, tends to accumulate in the flesh, especially the involuntary muscles of the heart. Internal radiation at close distance affects the rhythm of the heart beat, causing a fatal seizure.

Another vital organ, constantly infused by the bloodstream, is the brain, whose circuitry is susceptible to cesium-emitted neutrons. Subsequent brain damage can lead to seizures and hemorrhages, which more often than not can be fatal.

Elderly Japanese, especially males, are prone to radiation dosages because of their prior exposure during the two decades of atmospheric atomic testing in the South Pacific. Those warm waters are breeding grounds for tuna, which comprise a significant part of the national diet, especially for older residents. Another factor for vulnerability among that postwar generation is the repeated high dosages of X-rays at a time when tuberculosis was a major public health risk

Projection for Baby Boomers and Children

The lack of any reasonable degree of guidance, due to radiation denial among health authorities and the medical community, some tentative projections are provided here, although admittedly based on a questionable set of official data.

The burgeoning death rate will probably not continue for many more years, given that the relatively healthy baby-boomer generation are reaching retirement age. By the time of their childhood years, nutrition, public health and medical care had improved dramatically across Japan. Due to their habitual drinking of alcohol and chain smoking, however, radiation exposure from the ongoing Fukushima meltdowns is likely to expedite cancers of the lung, liver and brain.

Child mortality, which has yet to show up strongly in the 2011-12 findings, can be expected to rise significantly from 2015 onward, given the “gestation” period of leukemia, heart disease and cancers of the lung and gut. A major crisis in pediatrics has, however, already started with many reports of larynx nodules in Fukushima children. The threat to child health across the nation is rooted in the criminal failure of the Education Ministry to ensure a radiation-free diet in lunch programs. The provision of radioactive beef in school meals goes far beyond negligence and corruption into grounds for manslaughter charges ­ that is in any basically democratic society, which Japan is not.

The politics of radiation denial only adds to the ongoing tragedy after the Fukushima meltdowns. The downsizing of Japan’s population will probably last for another half century, unless a second wave of meltdowns transforma the archipelago into an  uninhabitable wasteland. With its irrational policies, the current government seems determined to do just that, bring down a nuclear apocalypse upon the diminishing ranks of the Japanese people.

Call to Medical Ethics

Bound by their outdated norms of strict case privacy, doctors and hospitals are failing their patients by not speaking out for public health, starting with a critique of the Health Ministry for issuing a report that allows no consideration of radiation as a health threat. The Fukushima meltdowns are posing a life-and-death issue, and the Hippocratic Oath demands a courageous ethical stance among health professionals.

While the radiation-linked deaths are at an epidemic level, the greater problem is living within an environment overwhelmed and continually aggravated by the Fukushima meltdowns. Lifelong radiation-linked illnesses, with their many irritating and painful symptoms, can hardly be called “living”. Deprived of jobs and medical care, many citizens have opted to commit suicide rather than continue on in hopeless misery. The casual acceptance of a neighbor’s suicide out of desperation is a deplorable disgrace happening as it is in one of the world’s richest societies.

The responsibility for these deaths and suicides lies in a tyrannical bureaucracy and the pro-nuclear politicians who deny the existence of any public health threat related to radiation exposure. Even their latest whitewash, the Health Ministry’s demographics report on 2012 , cannot but silently point toward a “radiation epidemic” sweeping Japan.


Yet the officials go on shamelessly repeating the obvious lie that nobody has yet to die from the lethal rain from Fukushima. Under the iron rule of "see no evil,  hear no evil, speak no evil", the dying Japanese people are prisoners on the Planet of the Apes.

Yoichi Shimatsu, a science writer based in Hong Kong, is former editor of The Japan Times Weekly.


02 January 2013

AIDS in the United States- update (video)



How Sugar Makes You Fat

About 100 years ago the average person ate only 4 pounds of sugar per year. A century later the average is more than 150 pounds and climbing. What happens when the body is confronted with 40 times as much sugar as compared to a traditional diet? You could imagine that increasing anything by 40 times would cause a problem. So there is no wonder that that much sugar is the root cause of obesity and all the related health conditions. But exactly what does sugar do in the body to make you fat? Here is a new explanation...

The REAL reason you eat too much: New theory could revolutionise the way we lose weight

| 

Professor Robert Lustig explains that leptin resistance - and sugar - is at the root of the obesity epidemic
Professor Lustig explains that leptin resistance - and sugar - is at the root of the obesity epidemic
Waistband feeling a bit tighter, or buttons straining after Christmas?
While it’s easy to blame your appalling willpower or TV-inspired lethargy, according to a respected U.S. obesity expert, weight gain might not be your fault at all.
In a fascinating new book, Robert Lustig, a professor of clinical paediatrics at the University of California, expounds a whole new scientific theory. 
He argues that the urge to overeat and lounge around doing nothing is not a sign of weakness. 
It is, he says, a hormonal issue, triggered by eating too much sugar.
He points the finger of blame at the hormone leptin, which acts like an appetite thermostat. 
As one of two ‘hunger hormones’ in the body, leptin works to decrease the appetite (its partner, ghrelin, increases appetite). 
When you have had enough to eat, your fat cells release leptin, which effectively dulls the appetite by instructing the brain that it’s time to stop eating. 
But Professor Lustig warns that our sweet tooth is sending this process haywire.

SUGAR TRICKS YOUR BRAIN

For many years scientists thought obesity could be caused by a shortage of leptin — thinking that without adequate levels, overweight people simply never received the message that they were full. 
But more recent studies have shown that obese people have plenty of leptin (in fact, the fatter you are, the more of it you appear to have), but are more likely to be ‘leptin-resistant’. 
This means the cells in the brain that should register leptin no longer ‘read’ the signals saying the body is full, but instead assume it is starving — no matter how much food you continue to eat.
In panic, the brain pumps out instructions to increase energy storage — instigating powerful cravings for high-fat, high-sugar foods because these are the easiest and most immediate forms of energy — and conserve energy usage, by dampening any urge to get up off the sofa and go for a run. 
The food cravings are made even more intense — and impossible to resist — because leptin is supposed to dampen the feeling of pleasure and enjoyment you get from food by suppressing the release of the brain chemical dopamine, helping to decrease appetite. 
But if you are leptin-resistant, food never stops tasting delicious, no matter how much of it you eat.
This, says Professor Lustig, is why many overweight people find it so hard to stop eating, and why diets so often fail.

THE HUNGER HORMONE

Scientists have been struggling to work out what causes leptin resistance. 
But now Professor Lustig and his team have been able to show — in repeated studies on humans — that too much sugar in the diet is to blame. 
High sugar diets lead to spikes in the hormone. 
This is needed to clear sugar out of the blood and into storage as fat.
But repeated insulin spikes, due to a high sugar diet, can lead to a condition called ‘insulin resistance’ (when the cells have been so bombarded by insulin they no longer respond to it). 
Professor Lustig believes insulin resistance triggers leptin resistance, and, crucially, he has discovered that by reducing insulin levels it is possible to improve ‘leptin signalling’ (the brain’s ability to read leptin), stop cravings, put the brakes on food consumption — and trigger weight loss.
In his new book Fat Chance, Professor Lustig explains that leptin resistance — and sugar — is at the root of the obesity epidemic. 
A high sugar diet can trigger leptin resistance even if you are just slightly overweight. This is because sugar triggers a spike in insulin
A high sugar diet can trigger leptin resistance even if you are just slightly overweight. This is because sugar triggers a spike in insulin
He believes 1.5 billion overweight or obese people in the world suffer from this condition — and is convinced that the problem can be tackled by targeting insulin. 
In his studies, many participants took insulin-lowering drugs, but the professor says similar results can be achieved by a few small lifestyle changes — notably reducing sugar in your diet. 
The professor has a heavyweight background in endocrinology (the study of hormones), as both a medical doctor and academic. 
He used organised trials to study  the role the brain plays in governing appetite and activity levels and found that patients who had damage to the hypothalamus (the area of the brain that controls energy levels) could not lose weight, but somehow gained weight even when restricted to a near-starving 500 calories a day.
Lustig realised that a similar process could be happening with obese adults and set out to investigate a potential solution. 
His studies revealed that the roles of leptin and insulin are intertwined, and bind to cells in the same area of the brain — the hypothalamus.

SWEET FOOD LEAVES YOU WANTING MORE

A high sugar diet can trigger leptin resistance even if you are just slightly overweight. This is because sugar triggers a spike in insulin. 
While leptin activates biochemical reactions that send ‘satiety signals’ to the brain, insulin can very effectively block these signals, resulting in no satiety, no sense of fullness, and uncontrolled eating of high fat, high sugar foods. 
This is leptin resistance, and leaves the brain ‘blind’ to leptin signals, so it still thinks we’re hungry. 
Even worse, in healthy people, one of the things leptin should do is to tell the brain to reduce insulin production. It does this by dulling appetite and thus reducing food intake (so cutting the body’s need to produce yet more insulin to deal with the food).
But if you have too much insulin and you are leptin-resistant this doesn’t happen, and insulin levels rise ever higher, creating a vicious cycle.
Lustig believes that our high sugar diets cause continually stimulated insulin production. 
He says the insidious creep of insulin resistance means that our bodies now produce double the insulin for every teaspoon of sugar consumed compared to 30 years ago. 
He says insulin resistance is now so widespread, it affects the majority of overweight people and even as many as 40 per cent of those who are normal weight (if they eat too much sugar and refined carbohydrates like white flour, bread, pasta and rice).
And leptin resistance becomes more of a problem with increasing body size: ‘Plump people might have a little leptin resistance, but the morbidly obese will have a lot,’ he says. 

WHY ONE CHOCOLATE IS NEVER ENOUGH

Professor Lustig believes that our high sugar diets cause continually stimulated insulin production
Professor Lustig believes that our high sugar diets cause continually stimulated insulin production
The sweet, processed food that makes up so much of the modern diet (much of it disguised as ‘low fat’ and therefore healthy) has addictive qualities — particularly for those caught up with leptin resistance.
When we eat food, the brain chemical dopamine is released, creating a feeling of pleasure and reward, explains Professor Lustig. 
Then leptin kicks in to suppress the release of dopamine, so that we get less reward, and therefore we stop eating.
But, he adds, if you’re leptin-resistant, the dopamine won’t be suppressed properly, and it remains at high levels in the brain, and ‘floods’ the brain cells.
After many meals (over a period of about three weeks) brain cells may start to become ‘tolerant’ to these persistently high levels of dopamine. 
They build up resistance, meaning that higher and higher amounts of dopamine are needed to trigger a reward signal. 
As a result, you may feel compelled to eat greater quantities to achieve the same sense of satisfaction. This can swiftly turn into sugar addiction. 
Insulin also works to clear dopamine from the brain, gradually blunting the reward felt for further food. 
But if you’re insulin-resistant too, the brakes won’t work, and the reward impetus continues unabated.
This, Professor Lustig believes, explains why many people can want, and apparently enjoy, never-ending quantities of food even when energy stores were long ago full — for example over the Christmas period. 
He fears insulin resistance (and therefore leptin resistance) may also start in the womb, and that exposure to high sugar diets — via the mother — may trigger genetic changes that increase a baby’s risk of insulin and leptin resistance in later life. 
But he adds: ‘At the end of the day, it is what you eat (and of course, how much of it) that puts the final nail in the coffin.’

A BIG FAT LIE

Conventional wisdom and government policy still blame dietary fat for our ever-rising obesity levels (and horrific heart disease statistics). 
However, Professor Lustig is part of the band of obesity specialists who question the validity of the hugely influential research conducted in the Fifties, which identified dietary fat as the trigger for weight gain and heart disease.
The seminal ‘Seven Countries’ study by U.S. epidemiologist Ancel Keys in the Eighties demonised fat, triggering a massive change in food manufacture. 
In an effort to make low fat food more palatable, many manufacturers raised the carbohydrate level, adding quantities of sugar to almost everything (both sweet and savoury). 
For instance, a small pot of low fat yoghurt can contain as much as four teaspoons of sugar, and even wholemeal bread hides two teaspoons per loaf.
Gradually tastes and eating habits have changed, Lustig says, resulting in growing populations worldwide inadvertently hooked on easy-to-eat high sugar foods. 
As he puts it: ‘The obesity epidemic was born in the aftermath of this seemingly logical and well-meaning, yet tragically flawed understanding of our biochemistry.’
Mercifully, it is not all doom and gloom.
‘Obesity is a hormonal problem and hormones are alterable,’ says Professor Lustig. 
He recommends simple steps, detailed below, that can lower your leptin levels. 
These include reducing sugar in every recipe by a third, increasing your fibre intake, and taking just 15 minutes of activity every day.

Adapted from Fat Chance: The Bitter Truth About Sugar,  by Robert Lustig, published by HarperCollins on January 3 at £13.99. 
© Robert Lustig 2013. To order a copy for £9.99 (postage and packing free), call 0844 472 4157.

HOW TO CONQUER YOUR CRAVINGS

Professor Lustig believes the key to losing weight is to reverse leptin resistance. Here is his action plan:

Have just one dessert a week

When cooking, reduce sugar in every recipe by a third, and eat dessert as a treat, once a week. 

Fibre leads to weight loss

Fibre is now routinely stripped from foods to give a finer texture and extend shelf life (manufacturers have found food with fibre doesn’t freeze well, and can’t be cooked quickly), but according to Professor Lustig: ‘Fibre, or roughage, is the most misunderstood weapon in our nutritional arsenal.’ 
This is because the digestive system has to work to strip away the outside bran of a wholegrain, so slowing the whole digestive process, and stopping glucose levels from peaking suddenly.
This means less insulin is released, therefore less energy is stored as fat. Slower digestion also gives your brain a chance to register that you are full.

Take 15 minutes’ exercise daily

Exercise alone cannot cause significant weight loss (unless you change your diet at the same time) but Professor Lustig says 15 minutes a day is enough to improve your insulin sensitivity (because activity helps cells become more receptive to insulin), and build muscle at the expense of fat. 
Although you may not see a drop on the scales, by improving insulin sensitivity and lowering insulin levels, exercise, will improve leptin signalling. 

Eat like your Grandma

Beware packaged food. Professor Lustig’s mantra is: ‘Don’t eat anything your grandmother wouldn’t recognise. If the food has a company logo you’ve heard of, it’s processed.’

Don’t eat on your feet

Eating standing up means you will be eating fast, with no time for satiety signals to kick in, says Professor Lustig. 
Always include some sort of protein (chicken, pulses) in every meal (to slow the digestive process and reduce the risk of insulin spikes) and avoid any ‘food’ that is just fat, carbohydrate and sugar (such as doughnuts, milk-shakes, pastries).



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2255442/The-REAL-reason-eat-New-theory-revolutionise-way-lose-weight.html#ixzz2Gq3De9u5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Radiation Spikes in Philadelphia- Again!

The pattern of deliberate lying commonly engaged in by the Japanese nuclear establishment of gloss over the catastrophe at Fukushima is apparently not native to Japan. Officials in Philadelphia engage in the same kind of wild over-the-top lies to hide the on-going nuclear crisis there. In Philadelphia, radioactive waste water from the Limmerick nuclear power plant has been dumped into the river that supplies Philadelphia with water. This is said to be 'legal' by officials. Now officials are blaming 'thyroid patients' taking radioactive iodine as the cause of the new crisis! They claim there is no health risk to the population!
 This is an astounding degree of duplicity 
that staggers the imagination! 
The simple truth is: There is no safe level of radiation!

Radiation Spikes in Philadelphia Drinking Water- Again! 
Levels of radioactive iodine-131 in a city drinking-water intake rose to their highest level yet [...]
“The biggest message is that it’s not a health issue,” said David Allard, director of the state Department of Environmental Protection’s Bureau of Radiation Protection.
Still, they continue to watch as they have since the issue surfaced in 2011 with more monitoring after an earthquake and tsunami severely damaged Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Officials then found that a little-known sampling program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency had been detecting spikes of iodine-131 in Philadelphia and other places that get drinking water from rivers and streams.
[...] agencies traced the scattered spikes to excretions by thyroid patients [...]
On Oct. 17, the latest date for which readings are available, the level of one sample at the Belmont water plant, on the Schuylkill, reached a record 5.46 picocuries per liter. [...]
A national drinking-water standard sets the permissible limit at 3 picocuries per liter, but that figure is for a yearly average, not a single sample. [...]