16 November 2011

Death: A Sweet Thing Called Sugar


Over my medical career I have been astonished over and over again over how bad sugar really is. The more Iearn about it the more horrible it is. Among other things it has to rank as a major curse on modern society, right up there with the radioactive wind, rain and currents from Fukushima and the massive toxic contamination of the environment with poisonous chemicals, drugs and multiple other nasties. The good thing about sugar is- since it is largely self-administered, it can be stopped at any time. If it is death, it is a voluntary death that need not occur. We are not powerless against it although we may pretend to be. The only thing weak about us is our excuses.


Carcinogenic Sugars Rampant Among Food Supply | See the Numbers

Andre Evans

NaturalSociety
November 15, 2011
sugarcube3 210x131 Carcinogenic Sugars Rampant Among Food Supply | See the NumbersHow much sugar does the average person consume? How does this affect their health? Increasingly it is being recognized that the substantial level of sugar consumption is responsible for many of the health issues the average person faces, including obesity, diabetes, and chronic lethal afflictions like cancer and heart disease.
Products and diets of today are overloaded on sugar, and its overbearing prevalence manifests in many different forms. Most soft drinks contain either sugar or mercury-filled high fructose corn syrup in copious amounts.
Even so-called “healthy alternatives” are loaded up on sugar in many instances. In fact, the sugar content of the product may deceive you. The average snack product and the majority of fast food products contain grains or starches that break down into sugar when digested. Even more concerning is just how these products are pushed on unsuspecting consumers.
Candy is cunningly advertised to our children, while boasting the largest amounts of sugar. Nearly everywhere you look, a typical consumer-marketed food product contains some amount of sugar. It’s almost impossible to escape it in its myriad of forms, and the conventional artificial sweetener alternatives likeaspartame and sucralose are even more unhealthy.
To make matters worse, a growing body of research has found fructose to be as addictive as cocaine.
Most people aren’t even satisfied when they consume these foods. The sweetness of a high sugar content food or drink often provides temporary energy, but no lasting satisfaction or nutritional intake. The body uses a large amount of energy and resources to properly process sugar, and the more you consume, the longer it be exerting this energy. This process may prevent your body from performing optimally, leading you to feel sluggish and tired when consuming sugar-laden foods with no real nutritional substance all day long.
The disturbing aspect is that if nothing changes, the rampant sugar consumption continues, and cumulatively begins bearing down on the wellness of an individual in the form of diseases like diabetes and cancer. Just how much sugar are you consuming on a daily basis? Keep in mind that the recommended amount of sugar to consume on a daily basis is 25g.
  • An average bottle of Coke contains over 60g of sugar.
  • A Red Bull contains up to 27g of sugar.
  • Supposedly healthy Vitamin Water contains up to 13g of sugar.
  • An 8oz Snapple contains up to 23g of sugar.
  • A single Pop Tart contains 17g of sugar.
  • A Cinnabon Cinnamon Roll has up to 55g.
  • Most kids cereals, like Capn Crunch, Frosted Flakes and Trix contain anywhere from 10-12g of sugar per serving.
  • A 16oz Starbucks Mocha Grande Frappuccino contains over 40g of sugar.
  • On average, a pint of ice cream contains up to 80g of sugar, about 20g per serving.
This is just a smidgeon of examples, but knowing that these foods are eaten daily and usually in large quantities illustrates the massive nature of sugar over consumption. It is no surprise that fructose has been noted as the number one source of calories in the average American’s diet. The average person is said to consume 1/3rd of a pound of sugar each day, which equates to over 150g of sugar- six times the recommended 25g.
The fact is that the average diet is absolutely teeming with unsafe quantities of sugar, and as they compound they will undoubtedly lead to disease and sickness. When you are consuming six times what is considered the safe amount of sugar, it cannot possibly end well.
Looking for healthier alternatives will not only help you to alleviate the many negative health effects of sugar over-consumption, but it will also cue you into the fact that a well thought out, nutritional plan will leave you much more satisfied than sugar-loaded processed foods.
Begin to limit your intake of sugar, even if it’s in small steps. Start with one less snack, or substituting a soft drink for water. Add less cream or sugar to your coffee. Replace candy and snacks with more fruits and vegetables. Be aware that even many products being marketed as health-promoting often contain a large amount of sugar. Make sure to check how much sugar is in whatever product you may be purchasing. And in order to keep the sweetness present in your favorite foods, add a little diabetes-crushing Stevia — a natural sweetener that is a great alternative to sugar. 
Explore More:
  1. This Drink is Just as Dangerous as Soda
  2. Cancer Feeds on Fructose, America’s Number One Source of Calories
  3. Reading Food Labels | The First Step to Healthy Food Shopping
  4. Experts Say Sugar is Dangerous & Bad for your Health
  5. Can Sugar be Poisonous?

10 November 2011

The Massive Insanity of Vaccination Revealed

How insane can insanity get? Apparently there are no limits to the collective "scientific" insanity of vaccine advocates. This kind of mass hysteria, a kind of mystical religious fanaticism of a high priesthood of white jacketed lunatic "researchers", has now reached the point where the last shred of common sense has been obliterated. These people are now recommending with a straight face the abandonment of breast feeding in third world countries so that their worthless vaccines will work better! The depths of such madness are unfathomable! Adding malnutrition to vaccine toxicities is an act of criminal insanity and a genocidal crime against humanity!

Over the course of the past few years we have been gathering studies from the US National Library of Medicine on the adverse unintended consequences of vaccination. Along the way we discovered a study published in the Journal of Pediatric Infections & Diseases in 2010 which, after posting it to our Facebook group, became the most viral article we have ever shared at 4,518 times thus far: 
Vaccination proponents have suggested that breastfeeding should be delayed in order to prevent immune factors within breast milk from inactivating vaccine-associated antibody titer elevations and vaccine potency. GreenMedInfo Summary
Abstract Title:
Inhibitory effect of breast milk on infectivity of live oral rotavirus vaccines.
Abstract Source:
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Oct;29(10):919-923. GreenMedInfo.com
Abstract Author(s):
Andi L Shane, Baoming Jiang, Luck Ju Baek, Penelope Dennehy, Pratima Ray, Roger I Glass, Sung-Sil Moon, Trang Nguyen, Umesh Parashar, Yuhuan Wang
Article Affiliation:
From the *National Centers for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA;†Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; ‡The National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam; §Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India; ¶Department of Pediatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI; ∥Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine,
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:: Live oral rotavirus vaccines have been less immunogenic and efficacious among children in poor developing countries compared with middle income and industrialized countries for reasons that are not yet completely understood. We assessed whether the neutralizing activity of breast milk could lower the titer of vaccine virus and explain this difference in vitro.
METHODS: Breast milk samples were collected from mothers who were breast-feeding infants 4 to 29 weeks of age (ie, vaccine eligible age) in India (N = 40), Vietnam (N = 77), South Korea (N = 34), and the United States (N = 51). We examined breast milk for rotavirus-specific IgA and neutralizing activity against 3 rotavirus vaccine strains-RV1, RV5 G1, and 116E using enzyme immunoassays. The inhibitory effect of breast milk on RV1 was further examined by a plaque reduction assay.
FINDINGS: Breast milk from Indian women had the highest IgA and neutralizing titers against all 3 vaccine strains, while lower but comparable median IgA and neutralizing titers were detected in breast milk from Korean and Vietnamese women, and the lowest titers were seen in American women. Neutralizing activity was greatest against the 2 vaccine strains of human origin, RV1 and 116E. This neutralizing activity in one half of the breast milk specimens from Indian women could reduce the effective titer of RV1 by∼2 logs, of 116E by 1.5 logs, and RV5 G1 strain by ∼1 log more than that of breast milk from American women.
INTERPRETATION: The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity inbreast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.
What about this study caused the flurry of interest?  Could it be the obviously disturbing implications of suggesting women in the underdeveloped world temporarily stop breast feeding (often the only source of infant nutrition) in order to increase the vaccine's purported "efficacy"? Are we to assume that these breast milk deprived infants should consume formula* in the interim?  And to what end? So that the vaccine can generate a temporary spike in antibody production, which is no measure of real world effectiveness? 
*Infant formula has been linked to 48 adverse effects, including increased mortality.
First, it must be made clear that the term "efficacy" when used in the context of a vaccine's antibody elevating effects does not equate to effectiveness, i.e. whether a vaccine actually works in real life to protect against the intended infection.
It is this semantic trick (conflating and confusing "efficacy" with "effectiveness") which convinces most of the "developed" world that vaccine research is "evidence-based" and focused on creating enhanced immunity, when in fact it is simply a highly successful business enterprise founded on defrauding its "customers" of both their money and health. The dangers of common vaccines are so well known by the "experts" and the manufacturers who produce them that their risk (like nuclear power) is underwritten by world governments. The importance of this fact can not be understated.
Introducing foreign pathogenic DNA, chemicals, metals, etc., into the body through a syringe will generate a response, not unlike kicking a bee hive. The harder you kick that beehive, the greater the "efficacy" (i.e. elevated antibodies), but the actual affinity these antibodies will have for the antigen of concern, can not be guaranteed; nor must the vaccine reseachers prove antibody-antigen affinity to receive FDA approval. 
Also, valuable immune resources are wasted by generating "false flag" responses to threats which may not readily exist in the environment, e.g. there are over 200 forms of influenza A, B & C which can cause the symptoms associated with annual influenza A, so the seasonal trivalent flu vaccine only takes care of little more than 1% of the possible vectors of infection - and at the price of distracting away from real threats and exhausting the entire immune apparatus.
What's worse, the vaccine response can "blow back" causing loss of self-tolerance and, via the resultant Th2 dominant immune system, the body can attack itself (autoimmunity).  In the meantime, the first line of defense against infection (Th1) is compromised and the "front door" can be left wide open to unmet infecitious challenges.
It is clear that one can create a synthetic immune response through vaccination, but it is not likely to result in enhanced immunity insofar as effectiveness is concerned, which is the only true judge of whether a vaccine is valuable or not.  One might view the basic criteria used by vaccine researchers, namely, that generating elevated antibody titers proves the value of the vaccine, oppositely: proving the vaccine is causing harm to the developing infant by generating unnecessarily elevated antibodies by any means necessary, i.e. throwing the chemical and biological kitchen sink at the immune system, e.g. aluminum, phenol, diploid cells, peanut oil, pertactin, etc. 
In the same way that secretory IgA from breast milk deactivates a broad range of "natural" antigenic challenges for the infant, this indispensable immune factor also deactivates the inherently disruptive and immunotoxic antibody-generating vaccine antigens and adjuvants. Rather than view this as the "enemy," the reduction in antibodies that accomodates a well nourished breastfed infant's bloodwork after the highly invasive and unnatural introduction of a vaccine is a sign of health, not disease.
This study struck a deep psychic chord out there. Images of phallic syringes stabbing away jealously at the symbolic breast of Nature come to mind, as the increasingly invasive ethos of modern hyper-technological medicine drives itself (and us) to the point of insanity "improving upon Nature."  Can't we just leave the timeless wisdom of mothering and nourishing that is woven into the mother-infant dyad alone? 
Additional Topics:
Infant Formula: Risk Factor for 48 Diseases
Breast Feeding: Risk Reduction for 59 Diseases
Vaccination Research
Article: Infant Formula For Disaster



Successful Cancer Treatment Attacked- Again! (video)

The most important thing in cancer treatment, you would think, is- Does it work?
Well if you think that you'd be wrong. The most important thing in cancer treatment seems to be-
Do what the FDA tells you to do, doctor, even if it doesn't work.
The name of the game is - Obey the government even if it costs your patient his life!
The world famed cancer specialist Dr Stanislaw Burzynski has developed a unique personalized way to successfully treat all forms of cancer that is scientifically verified to work. That's not why he is being attacked. He is being attacked because he is not following government guidelines that are proven NOT to work! In other words, you are only allowed to treat cancer unsuccessfully. The minute you succeed you are in trouble!


09 November 2011

59 Reasons to Breast Feed Your Baby

Here is a treasure trove of information on the benefits to health of breast feeding infants. This of course is only a partial list and does not include the bonding of mother and child and the psychological strength that brings to both mother and child. These are hard cold scientific research articles that give the details of the medical benefits of breast feeding. It may be a good idea to send these articles to your pediatrician who may not be aware of these facts, or the detrimental effects of formula feeding.

Relevant Therapeutic Actions
Pubmed Data : Acta Paediatr. 2002;91(3):275-9. PMID: 12022298
Study Type : Review
Pubmed Data : Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001 Jan-Feb;17(1):51-4. PMID: 11241891
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e31-8. Epub 2007 Nov 5. PMID: 17980469
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jan;62(1):32-8. Epub 2007 Feb 21. PMID: 17311056
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Pediatr. 2001 Aug;139(2):261-6. PMID: 11487754
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Feb;21(1 Pt 1):60-6. Epub 2010 Jan 14. PMID:20088862
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Br J Dermatol. 2009 Aug;161(2):373-83. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PMID: 19239469
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Dec;104(6):1251-7. PMID: 10589009
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Dev Psychobiol. 2007 Mar;49(2):129-38. PMID: 17299785
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Int Breastfeed J. 2006;1:16. Epub 2006 Sep 15. PMID: 16978397
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):534-7. PMID: 19083576
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):e465-71. PMID: 15121990
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 Jul;46(6):547-9. PMID: 17579109
Study Type : Human: Case Report
Pubmed Data : Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Dec;38(12):747-53. PMID: 15321436
Study Type : Meta Analysis
Pubmed Data : Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 May;75(5):914-21. PMID: 11976167
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1433-40. Epub 2010 May 17. PMID: 20478942
Study Type : Meta Analysis
Pubmed Data : Pediatr Res. 2009 Nov;66(5):565-70. PMID: 19581824
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Arch Dis Child. 2006 May;91(5):417-9. Epub 2006 Feb 1. PMID: 16452109
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Acta Paediatr. 2009 Aug;98(8):1344-8. Epub 2009 Apr 28. PMID: 19432839
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Acta Paediatr. 2007 Aug;96(8):1228-32. Epub 2007 Jun 21. PMID: 17590186
Study Type : Review
Pubmed Data : J Med Microbiol. 2000 Aug;49(8):719-23. PMID: 10933257
Study Type : In Vitro Study
Pubmed Data : Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;36(4):363-9. PMID: 19145723
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):E67. PMID: 11581475
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Arch Dis Child. 2009 Oct;94(10):801-5. Epub 2009 Jun 24. PMID: 19556219
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1448-52. Epub 2010 May 17. PMID: 20478932
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Dec;169(12):1471-6. Epub 2010 Jul 9. PMID: 20617343
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 15;48(4):430-7. PMID: 19133802
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Breastfeed Med. 2008 Jun;3(2):103-9. PMID: 18563998
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Int J Pediatr. 2009;2009:648091. Epub 2009 Mar 12. PMID: 20041019
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986 Mar-Apr;5(2):242-7. PMID: 3514832
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jun;15(3):233-40. PMID: 17443195
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Feb;1(2):138-41. PMID: 18352783
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Additional Keywords : Risk Reduction : CK(1065) : AC(195)
Pubmed Data : Arch Dis Child. 2010 Sep 27. Epub 2010 Sep 27. PMID: 20876557
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : J Med Food. 2010 Jun;13(3):589-98. PMID: 20566605
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1048-56. Epub 2010 Apr 5. PMID: 20368314
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):418-26. Epub 2005 Jun 17. PMID: 15976892
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : BMJ. 1990 Jan 6;300(6716):11-6. PMID: 2105113
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Meat Sci. 2009 Jun 16. Epub 2009 Jun 16. PMID: 19010360
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Adv Neonatal Care. 2003 Apr;3(2):76-87. PMID: 12881949
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e115-23. PMID: 16818526
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e953-9. PMID: 17908750
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Int Breastfeed J. 2007;2:6. Epub 2007 Mar 30. PMID: 17397549
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Trop Pediatr. 2000 Apr;46(2):92-6. PMID: 10822935
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;166(9):935-41. Epub 2007 Jan 20. PMID: 17237965
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Ann Neurol. 2011 Jul ;70(1):30-40. PMID: 21786297
Study Type : Meta Analysis
Pubmed Data : Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Aug 2. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PMID: 21809438
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;646:51-8. PMID: 19536662
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Additional Keywords : Risk Reduction : CK(1065) : AC(195)
Pubmed Data : Turk J Pediatr. 2009 Jan-Feb;51(1):35-43. PMID: 19378889
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Sep;88(3):789-96. PMID: 18779297
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007;10(6):259-66. Epub 2007 Nov 26. PMID: 18040595
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 Aug;51(8):24-39. PMID: 17974740
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;31(3):337-47. PMID: 17559328
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2004;79(1-2):1-12. PMID: 16916046
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jun;44(6):369-73. PMID: 18476931
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):599-607. PMID: 16958715
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Int Breastfeed J. 2008;3:18. Epub 2008 Aug 6. PMID: 18684325
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec;88(6):1543-51. PMID: 19064514
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Pubmed Data : Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Oct;29(10):919-923. PMID: 20442687
Study Type : Commentary
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Anti Therapeutic Actions : Vaccination: All : CK(2699) : AC(254)
Pubmed Data : J Nutr. 2002 Jun;132(6):1293-8. PMID: 12042449
Study Type : Human Study
Toxicological Articles
Pubmed Data : Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Dec ;39(10):337-43. PMID: 18386435
Study Type : Human Study
Pubmed Data : Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Jan ;20(1):21-7. PMID: 9023037
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Problem Substances : Infant Formula : CK(393) : AC(51)
Adverse Pharmacological Actions : Immunosuppressive : CK(65) : AC(15)
Pubmed Data : Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar 23:1-9. Epub 2011 Mar 23. PMID: 21426621
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Problem Substances : Infant Formula : CK(393) : AC(51)
Pubmed Data : Turk J Pediatr. 2009 Nov-Dec;51(6):527-33. PMID: 20196384
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Problem Substances : Infant Formula : CK(393) : AC(51)
Pubmed Data : Matern Child Health J. 2011 Apr 20. Epub 2011 Apr 20. PMID: 21505776
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Problem Substances : Infant Formula : CK(393) : AC(51)
Pubmed Data : Breastfeed Med. 2011 Oct ;6:313-8. PMID: 22007819
Study Type : Human Study
Additional Links
Therapeutic Actions : Breastfeeding : CK(437) : AC(59)
Problem Substances : Infant Formula : CK(393) : AC(51)